From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-51532-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26530 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2012 22:49:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 26520 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Nov 2012 22:49:12 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ia0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ia0-f175.google.com) (209.85.210.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:49:07 +0000
Received: by mail-ia0-f175.google.com with SMTP id z3so1471423iad.20        for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:49:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.5.141 with SMTP id s13mr9214999igs.58.1352760546959; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:49:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.158.202 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:49:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <fb73f1b34bb7.50a133cf@blastwave.org>
References: <fb7fa594132.50a0d908@blastwave.org>	<CAKOQZ8xJ37xobw2phuRO8crFjsnpvg_eZMujCou2VzzGjoCcWg@mail.gmail.com>	<fb55f0542dd5.50a11d0d@blastwave.org>	<50A16762.7050202@cs.utoronto.ca>	<fbae80b8920.50a121d4@blastwave.org>	<CAH6eHdTqOVNy8sqxNVcU-own7XJEf1rqQm1Ciyi3HfvDo94qqg@mail.gmail.com>	<fb50f92518ae.50a124b8@blastwave.org>	<50A16CF5.4080609@cs.utoronto.ca>	<fbae8ec26b2b.50a12a7c@blastwave.org>	<CAH6eHdQws=fXPp45PHEgQdR9EkHoMr5eLo8goyEF7iqH0WCULQ@mail.gmail.com>	<fb509f634573.50a13045@blastwave.org>	<CAH6eHdTh4eNwDnvZfWpKoiJxnA8jKJ173hYtL81Eg-+6cJD27w@mail.gmail.com>	<fb73f1b34bb7.50a133cf@blastwave.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:49:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdQ-iehaf9WB02u9qg_Vm+f7LY0X3tUngtj8C5HV8ZF3oQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: the struggle for a 64-bit GCC on Solaris 10 - part 2
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org>
Cc: Ryan Johnson <ryan.johnson@cs.utoronto.ca>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org, 	ebotcazou@adacore.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00090.txt.bz2

On 12 November 2012 22:37, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> I'm giving this a try :
>
>     CC='gcc -m64 -D__XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -g'
>
> ... thus far it has not blown up in 71 secs.  :-\

It will fail with the same error in prettyprint.g

The macro __XOPEN_SOURCE is wrong, it should be a single underscore,
so the headers will ignore it and define the non-standard iconv(3)
signature, as it you hadn't defined the macro at all.