From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3430B3857033
 for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:33:42 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 3430B3857033
Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id p22so2533873wmg.3
 for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 04:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=BxGjFLMzFsDcJjTHRVmrEQ6P4NBxvsJbS7cY2K+dquA=;
 b=C6ODqdp5SVjCejSa6Q+zaLut472bdZ74qP5vjGsus1ih/gvfmUGdVzZevRvSGP3963
 wSFfn91G6ZlEsIhtUBRnHkB3kmkCSvaI0kRnGDRAJTMwbgTxqNlYTnXrUKhLOvQAE9aA
 juDE+G5eW71eaOrijynJp8E2wi0JP5RJMHkUBLVvWntUeOjMQb/WDn2gT2LK7OWhftR+
 gc2kC5eTqeBhubkj7TkapP0FMZJhRdjKvf1rOVz30Qe39kM/XnyVoqPcBWWFY3K/Nn7X
 IjJRHN6ASXXAsEE+KAX+bEC2ie3Xya0Ok3uCr1yDe10c2j5IHytbsaPwbeMBgMwBecdw
 wUXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533PIuzknIi8xspWjMYwjipG7+uT4fbACQXyhyhb2Wf771MEWBQq
 xZ3jcidcMBe1zuORPTrdNE71cP530hlUT3jPtTY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2TUTL7+ht146biS4B86bAlJPufgybgXE1XcID1vmywACWsZxn5txI+NGhLbeYpiQiMHMeDe9mpVgkkMCVcJY=
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c085:: with SMTP id r5mr2078979wmh.17.1604057621301;
 Fri, 30 Oct 2020 04:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFkJGRcnuJc5pzLoDpUj=8iK_2BJLEV0x0+86Mo6J3=SRoBG6Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFkJGRcnuJc5pzLoDpUj=8iK_2BJLEV0x0+86Mo6J3=SRoBG6Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:33:30 +0000
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdQM0265JOEM7vRKwmG26zEptjad6LJa=FBBtRTTPDrs4g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Pointlessly fragile constexpr vector implementation I need some
 guidance on.
To: Josh Marshall <joshua.r.marshall.1991@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-help <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-help mailing list <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-help>,
 <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-help>,
 <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:33:43 -0000

On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 01:10, Josh Marshall via Gcc-help
<gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> This side project is definitely showing me a few of my shortcomings as a
> programmer, so please bear with me while I try to learn.  I have an
> implementation of constexpr vector which works in the null case, but fails
> on any case when it is constructed with contents or has contents added.

Let's discuss this on the libstdc++ mailing list, not gcc-help. I'll
reply there instead.