From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 437B03858D31
 for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 08:47:40 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 437B03858D31
Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id f3so10094677ioj.1
 for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 01:47:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=WZEJi76FShm0xwnm0cl6e9ZjxVO46joulmx4OKOjvf0=;
 b=C2GjveltJP0Moq61zgIwsEc9BpLSqM8UdK0zXkOSTLbs01+jufw8NoFak5Lp+WP5iN
 vOiox6Unv5UXbHDcThY7EzK4eMv9IDdsh3WiTuTpRnsk5IRtabTH8qZsVOVXuCAVBNg3
 ZHiS8L1xMsI2OY5ZoM5SC/OmlPitM95nouZ5HNxfMzkxvyYbPTXvCi51yV9VjMNkAFW4
 w1xuc9OvapHSuvOr/Ydomu9Bx57aH97Mkwl8/nteMjOC9H+TXhxL9xGMjndyGW/e2ukn
 b0YROBZBBlfjmSap9GwC6BvtmKqkprVt0fItSGGollEvCluMoivSaJ4mnBWBE39hjFnV
 wrmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubUcrXwqvY+KnPa9dEeL3/Y/YsB63Bok+AXqKEOlizIAYEOiJhi
 11MDXOmdMwNb4ygCvf352YZo2RsPE2dwDGUd8OU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJzo4V+sT1ZTby0hVM/7N2eaIsQl1/LeUC0xtI4MVFXu+v4JoaxfUg7pSLP2USNALoaNXnHaB4BpLjOmX2iytY=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:2708:: with SMTP id g8mr3181083jaa.52.1587372459813;
 Mon, 20 Apr 2020 01:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <590749852.1515706.1587371249089.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
 <590749852.1515706.1587371249089@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <590749852.1515706.1587371249089@mail.yahoo.com>
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:47:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdRW4OT7fN5ZqEYAEOdL_82ZgKRDgPTcYpByroCaet88CA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Specifying where Binutils is and what it is called
To: "R. Diez" <rdiezmail-gcc@yahoo.de>
Cc: "gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-help mailing list <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-help>,
 <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-help>,
 <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 08:47:41 -0000

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 09:27, R. Diez wrote:
>
> > That seems like an unnecessary worry. Why would the
> > phase 1 compiler install *more* than the final one?
>
> That is a very bold claim to make. GCC is a complex beast. Are you sure a=
bout that? Is there any test case for it? How about in the future? What if =
only need the C compiler to build Newlib, but the final toolchain only need=
s the C++ compiler, in order to reduce the total toolchain build time and s=
ave space in my final container?

So delete the cc1 executable after installation. That's not hard.