From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B2A6383F85F for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 18:23:15 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 6B2A6383F85F Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id e16so2521455ilc.12 for ; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 11:23:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KR3zyP5dFfLjGv7hvkjyTEOFzSmm4EVbEnyntO0dnWo=; b=seR7AAYaOINUSss0XXcZfrtu5Ox8j7mAAUt2Sw62aqMurwt6JoATnBCF1F7DaBCxP1 31jmIYGO85bd0xwWlqJgm2DwivF2v91XnV3Jk7TCdf8/6DqD47K+SsZjph4JkjIgFZ/J 71zFvJlS6eXt0or94p2+tp61vsD5534o09uCulM4xyDYdGg071fZo/hIUOtPiRvTQTPv 47VuZVIC5dEO5dmTGNO31RaudvoRjW2o5myIqFkAgsGz/3JXNwFKLZAvIYc4T8rVulli S1q1C7J81rzSSL9hOLQocR1/fVHVd3JjZBxTcjnfwv7gsiNSztVWI7s5oqWCHxH70wDE NS4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5305EumU2rs50vM1NWUlmRoH5B8p/hSlxQP/KPgpR7Il5iDRAB3r 5gRsSwCHKJ0bTpD6dQ4sav2lJDH4EBuCx+4MTUg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUTkgf0+xAbPr0vh2iJSyTfT4uwFRx0IXIHV2ZflrjkzOqymG0ILrpKHN7xepncKBsOAZX81owHcVgmhZyeo4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:e87:: with SMTP id t7mr5943463ilj.4.1596824595008; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 11:23:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 19:23:03 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: making double type default to 80 or 128 bytes To: dave Cc: gcc-help Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-help mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 18:23:16 -0000 On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 at 16:03, dave via Gcc-help wrote: > > > Is it possible to modify the gcc compiler so that recompiling existing > code and libraries will produce longer doubles (80 or 128 bytes) On some processor types, yes. For most, no.