From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3297 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2011 10:04:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 3287 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Nov 2011 10:04:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ey0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ey0-f175.google.com) (209.85.215.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:03:52 +0000 Received: by eaad13 with SMTP id d13so651960eaa.20 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:03:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.83.129 with SMTP id q1mr26619826wiy.55.1322215430471; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:03:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.139.105 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:03:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <26309068.4315341322211549493.JavaMail.root@wmail21> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: GCC: C0x11 threading support From: Jonathan Wakely To: "Erotavlas_turbo@libero.it" Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00260.txt.bz2 On 25 November 2011 10:01, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 25 November 2011 08:59, Erotavlas_turbo@libero.it wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have read that the threading programming proposed in new C++ standard >> (C0x11) > > (It was informally called C++0x but is now published and often > referred to as C++11, but calling it C++0x11 makes no sense.) Sorry, I meant calling it C0x11 makes no sense (although C++0x11 doesn't either)