From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12849 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2011 17:51:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 12832 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Nov 2011 17:51:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:51:40 +0000 Received: by wwf22 with SMTP id 22so7228246wwf.2 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:51:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.139.133 with SMTP id c5mr1797698wej.25.1322502699089; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:51:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.139.105 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:51:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <146485.5268141322491391316.JavaMail.root@wmail56> References: <146485.5268141322491391316.JavaMail.root@wmail56> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: GCC: C0x11 threading support From: Jonathan Wakely To: "Erotavlas_turbo@libero.it" Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00282.txt.bz2 On 28 November 2011 14:43, Erotavlas_turbo@libero.it wrote: > =A0for your fast reply. > I have understood that the support for C++11 (I hope it's right :)) is st= ill > not complete. I'm still not sure if you're talking about the compiler support or library support. Library support (std::mutex, std::thread, std::future etc.) is very nearly complete. Compiler support needs more work, but is quite usable. Using Boost might not help there anyway, because Boost can't make the compiler support something that it doesn't support. > But my fundamental question is how long does it take the > development process? Until it's ready ;-) > Is there a roadmap? No, I don't think so.