From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 62427 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2018 21:45:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 62141 invoked by uid 89); 29 Oct 2018 21:45:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=unusual, 0.1 X-HELO: mail-it1-f193.google.com Received: from mail-it1-f193.google.com (HELO mail-it1-f193.google.com) (209.85.166.193) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 21:45:27 +0000 Received: by mail-it1-f193.google.com with SMTP id i191-v6so11381474iti.5 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:45:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yU73EX258uOztvwBOkh+yn0fWRI8+2KCHohD3MY7NaY=; b=RAjq9y0vslI/aVpII+PvkVWChSLfiip7QxQKGYiOU8S+GcdaXz0oppw4J74EbmSZzi 86Cd5XxPgXrRlCr9Ya+R+kZZMMMGpoVzppfHpQJ3itIGClu94WwO/2fdVhmUEhgqg94+ KC5BsZ3NLwRHZepP4duB7wmttN8nro5djL9T0ZiKx46LWoaKyHHYYKDKrMUkDiS46H9+ 2bnokuqPcOJb3FqVS0CA5SBMe4PLXnID1VWfaxSx3ASk6lfAmhB7p/I8s+gtFXPLAzA1 pDwiYM9qDvRUYtYM9xhQQniXVbitjAVNZzk9ZP/rBoJ2ZPnfPspTpckKZeFx84jxK0eL JZ+Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4392479b-514c-495a-3d5c-15b523b18f97@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 21:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Tests Failing on x86_64_gnu To: nick Cc: gcc-help Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-10/txt/msg00136.txt.bz2 On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 21:40, nick wrote: > > > > On 2018-10-29 4:44 p.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > Please reply to the mailing list, not just to me. > > > > > Sorry thought it was sent to the list. > > Nick > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 20:14, nick wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 2018-10-29 3:31 p.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 18:05, nick wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Greetings, > >>>> > >>>> I just build,configuring and ran the tests from the upstream gcc git repo like this: > >>>> mdkir odbjir > >>>> cd obdjir > >>>> $PWD/../gcc/configure --prefix=$HOME/GCC-deve > >>>> make -j8 > >>>> make bootstrapq > >>> > >>> This is redundant, just saying "make" does the same thing. > >>> > >>>> make -k check > >>>> > >>>> Those are the steps from the offical docs unless I am missing a step i.e. does > >>>> make install need to be done or not? > >>> > >>> Done for what? It needs to be done to install the compiler you just > >>> built, but not to test it. > >>> > >>>> Don't know if this a reported issue or not. > >>> > >>> You haven't said what the issue is, so we can't say. > >>> > >> Jonathan, > >> The issues is after the above commands including make -k check it fails the tests on > >> on a Ubuntu 18.04, x86_64_gnu based system for the mainline git repo. Which tests? All of them? More than half of them? You're really not giving us much to go on here. You can compare your results with other people's results for recent trunk builds at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-10/ For recent x86_64-pc-linux-gnu builds I see about 0.1% of tests failing (a few for the compiler, and a few for libstdc++). It's not unusual for there to be a few failures at this point in the development cycle. If you want a stable compiler with no issues, don't use the development trunk. > >> I tried it > >> clean with the above steps and it fails including reporting a few unexpected failures. > >> Those steps above are the steps I ran in order to build and test it on a clean gcc without > >> anything else and it fails. I will run the tests again just to see if something is using too much > >> memory and making it fail as that may be the case but I doubt it. > >> > >> Sorry for the confusion, > >> Nick