* typo in GCC manual
@ 2012-01-08 12:36 ali hagigat
2012-01-09 1:38 ` Jonathan Wakely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: ali hagigat @ 2012-01-08 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
GCC manual, version 4.5.0, page 147:
3.15 Specifying subprocesses and the switches to pass to
them
*[spec_name ]:
If this results in an empty string then the
(Or, if the spec did not exist, then nothing will happened.)
----------------------------------------------------
I apologize if it was reported before but "nothing will happened"
seems incorrect in English!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: typo in GCC manual
2012-01-08 12:36 typo in GCC manual ali hagigat
@ 2012-01-09 1:38 ` Jonathan Wakely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2012-01-09 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ali hagigat; +Cc: gcc-help
On 8 January 2012 12:24, ali hagigat wrote:
> GCC manual, version 4.5.0, page 147:
>
> 3.15 Specifying subprocesses and the switches to pass to
> them
> *[spec_name ]:
> If this results in an empty string then the
> (Or, if the spec did not exist, then nothing will happened.)
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> I apologize if it was reported before but "nothing will happened"
> seems incorrect in English!
Indeed. It's already fixed on trunk:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Spec-Files.html#Spec-Files
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: typo in gcc manual
2011-04-06 3:15 typo in gcc manual ali hagigat
2011-04-06 8:00 ` Jonathan Wakely
@ 2011-04-06 14:37 ` Ian Lance Taylor
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ian Lance Taylor @ 2011-04-06 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ali hagigat; +Cc: gcc-help
ali hagigat <hagigatali@gmail.com> writes:
> 3.15 Specifying subprocesses and the switches to pass to them
> *[spec_name]:
> If this results in an empty string then the spec will be deleted. (Or,
> if the spec did not exist, then nothing will happened.)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> happened should be replaced with "happen" or with "be happned" I think.
Thanks.
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: typo in gcc manual
2011-04-06 3:15 typo in gcc manual ali hagigat
@ 2011-04-06 8:00 ` Jonathan Wakely
2011-04-06 14:37 ` Ian Lance Taylor
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2011-04-06 8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ali hagigat; +Cc: gcc-help, gcc-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 569 bytes --]
On 6 April 2011 04:15, ali hagigat wrote:
> 3.15 Specifying subprocesses and the switches to pass to them
> *[spec_name]:
> If this results in an empty string then the spec will be deleted. (Or,
> if the spec did not exist, then nothing will happened.)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> happened should be replaced with "happen" or with "be happned" I think.
>
Thanks, fixed by this patch, committed to trunk as obvious
2011-04-06 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
* doc/invoke.texi (Spec Files): Fix typo.
[-- Attachment #2: inv.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 790 bytes --]
Index: doc/invoke.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/invoke.texi (revision 172019)
+++ doc/invoke.texi (working copy)
@@ -9391,7 +9391,7 @@ This tells the compiler to create, overr
string. All lines after this directive up to the next directive or
blank line are considered to be the text for the spec string. If this
results in an empty string then the spec will be deleted. (Or, if the
-spec did not exist, then nothing will happened.) Otherwise, if the spec
+spec did not exist, then nothing will happen.) Otherwise, if the spec
does not currently exist a new spec will be created. If the spec does
exist then its contents will be overridden by the text of this
directive, unless the first character of that text is the @samp{+}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* typo in gcc manual
@ 2011-04-06 3:15 ali hagigat
2011-04-06 8:00 ` Jonathan Wakely
2011-04-06 14:37 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ali hagigat @ 2011-04-06 3:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
3.15 Specifying subprocesses and the switches to pass to them
*[spec_name]:
If this results in an empty string then the spec will be deleted. (Or,
if the spec did not exist, then nothing will happened.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
happened should be replaced with "happen" or with "be happned" I think.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-08 12:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-01-08 12:36 typo in GCC manual ali hagigat
2012-01-09 1:38 ` Jonathan Wakely
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-06 3:15 typo in gcc manual ali hagigat
2011-04-06 8:00 ` Jonathan Wakely
2011-04-06 14:37 ` Ian Lance Taylor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).