From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-il1-x12b.google.com (mail-il1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95CAC384A03E for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:04:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 95CAC384A03E Received: by mail-il1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id r2so3006132ilo.6 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 06:04:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NAR1D3bT7vymlsBgEelppyaMQjaSw/Sz44i1lDM0NXU=; b=i2zhkYz5lkY1EA2mP3KsJ0YfnJ2Def8oA7cb/5O+3TC4z/rU1Bxp0Ei8QvJS22N6Bg gKLR8lQ/xi7LqNgcUJXxsgASbMfWA8pYY0euP3BY9XZ4Cdh531pQ4/ZKzTbgexnFUgHb yGaqM3o/0672Ie9NivV/1ZhsrNhaVnvpOeXUSjghzJMrTpGSjuYDt0C2t4TmmdCGIinl +veL8m7f+JEogb204AFi1GBJG5jkT6Sh/KL4gM+qy4rD8CFLaBtLXWK6r2Hv3wxzGwYL xSpG+R5jigYZ4jRzCeDRNJGj1M01n2e5tbdzzAdi3Ufw4opiLaAl9TrFG4bVIr5jEBh0 zL1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZu4AGtpr6bWt89Q8kBf3LG5jrPhDtQLI01rp1zjW0q6DCIC+Ys KQGUH4wfDbcvcz+n9Ew04LLz4SdVaiPIQ7JilGw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypISDVGKPdJ8hJycKDU1/fVZifPvkDkJ5DLeQxctgclu0KNBM2FlpVyNZj2qgkBNUWRamtnK4LCQRR2HxZ9LZQI= X-Received: by 2002:a92:5f55:: with SMTP id t82mr16075213ilb.261.1587387883094; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 06:04:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:04:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: GCC 9.2, partial specialization with non-type template parameters: bug or not? To: Bence Kodaj Cc: gcc-help Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_LINKBAIT3, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-help mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:04:44 -0000 On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 11:05, Bence Kodaj via Gcc-help wrote: > > Hi again, > > After running my code through GCC 9.3 on godbolt, I can now answer my own > question :) Turns out this was indeed a bug in GCC 9.2, and it's fixed in > GCC 9.3. Yes, this was https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92150