On Sun, 11 Jun 2023, 22:05 Randy Galbraith via Gcc-help, < gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 12:27 PM Tom Kacvinsky via Gcc-help < > gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > HI, > > > > For some reason my follow-up hasn't made it through. > > > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 11:27 AM Tom Kacvinsky > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Those aren't binutils linker warnings. Those are coming from the > system > > > linker. Which probably means you are using the system assembler, too. > > Or > > > maybe even the odd case where you're using binutils for the assembler > but > > > the system linker. > > > > > > Can you try with using binutils for the assembler and linker? I am > > > assuming you either have an older version of GCC for building the newer > > > version of it, or perhaps you have the Sun Pro compilers. In any case, > > you > > > could use whichever bootstrap compiler you have to build binutils, and > > then > > > put they binutils in PATH. The GCC configure script should then chose > > > those for building. > > > > > > I missed that you're on AIX. So either you're using an older version of > > GCC to bootstrap, or IBM's xlc/xlC compilers to bootstrap. > > > > Here is a thought I had up re-thinking this. This might be an > > architecture problem. Which version of the POWER chips are you using? > > YOu might have to force the GCC configuration process to use -march to > > specify the right processor. But as far as I know, the configure script > > should be smart enough to figure that out. > > > > It's been about ten years since I used the xlc/xlC compilers, so I am > > not sure how one would select the architecture they want. > > > > Hi Tom. > > Our sys-admin team is upgrading AIX 7.1 to 7.2. This broke gcc (an issue > with IBM delivering non-ansi-standard header files). So my first step is an > attempt to bootstrap gcc 4.9.2 (or later) on a non-upgraded (7.1) system. > This would be using our existing install of gcc. > > $ gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 > > Here are the CPU details: > > $ prtconf > System Model: IBM,9040-MR9 > Machine Serial Number: XXXXXXX > Processor Type: PowerPC_POWER9 > Processor Implementation Mode: POWER 8 > Processor Version: PV_8_Compat > Number Of Processors: 4 > Processor Clock Speed: 2850 MHz > CPU Type: 64-bit > Kernel Type: 64-bit > LPAR Info: 12 XXXXXXXX > Memory Size: 31744 MB > Good Memory Size: 31744 MB > Platform Firmware level: VM930_145 > Firmware Version: IBM,FW930.50 (VM930_145) > Console Login: enable > Auto Restart: true > Full Core: false > NX Crypto Acceleration: Capable and Enabled > > > Details on "ld" and "as" as per configure: > > $ ./configure > checking build system type... powerpc-ibm-aix7.1.0.0 > > checking for gcc... gcc > checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out > checking whether the C compiler works... yes > > checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes > checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes > checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed > checking for g++... g++ > checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes > > checking for as... as > checking for dlltool... no > checking for ld... ld > > checking for cc... cc > checking for c++... c++ > checking for gcc... gcc > > checking for as... no > checking for as... as > > checking for ld... no > checking for ld... ld > > checking where to find the target ar... host tool > checking where to find the target as... host tool > checking where to find the target cc... just compiled > checking where to find the target c++... just compiled > checking where to find the target c++ for libstdc++... just compiled > checking where to find the target dlltool... host tool > checking where to find the target gcc... just compiled > checking where to find the target gcj... just compiled > > checking where to find the target ld... host tool > > > And "ld" and "as" I see at the command line: > > $ which ld > /usr/bin/ld > > $ file /usr/bin/ld > /usr/bin/ld: symbolic link to /usr/ccs/bin/ld > > $ file /usr/ccs/bin/ld > /usr/ccs/bin/ld: executable (RISC System/6000 V3.1) or obj module > > $ which as > /usr/bin/as > > $ file /usr/bin/as > /usr/bin/as: symbolic link to /usr/ccs/bin/as > > $ file /usr/ccs/bin/as > /usr/ccs/bin/as: executable (RISC System/6000 V3.1) or obj module > > Because gcc 4.9.2 is broken on our AIX 7.2 I am interested (though not as a > first step) in how to boostrap gcc using native C (xlc) compiler. Alas, I > am still in the process of learning what options can be sent to configure > to direct it to use xlc. > Bootstrapping gcc 13 works on AIX, is there a reason you have to use an ancient gcc? > I just saw Kai's -v suggestion. I'll try that and reply with the details. > > Cheers, -Randy >