From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-51521-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24023 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2012 21:26:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 24014 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Nov 2012 21:26:30 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ie0-f175.google.com) (209.85.223.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:26:13 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c13so10186058ieb.20        for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:26:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.12.138 with SMTP id y10mr9033521igb.58.1352755573162; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:26:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.158.202 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:26:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <fbae80b8920.50a121d4@blastwave.org>
References: <fb7fa594132.50a0d908@blastwave.org>	<CAKOQZ8xJ37xobw2phuRO8crFjsnpvg_eZMujCou2VzzGjoCcWg@mail.gmail.com>	<fb55f0542dd5.50a11d0d@blastwave.org>	<50A16762.7050202@cs.utoronto.ca>	<fbae80b8920.50a121d4@blastwave.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdTqOVNy8sqxNVcU-own7XJEf1rqQm1Ciyi3HfvDo94qqg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: the struggle for a 64-bit GCC on Solaris 10 - part 2
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org>
Cc: Ryan Johnson <ryan.johnson@cs.utoronto.ca>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org, 	ebotcazou@adacore.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2

On 12 November 2012 21:20, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>> I'm still really unclear on why you're having so much trouble with
>> this.
>> Have you tried bootstrapping with SunCC like I did? Granted, I'm only
>> on
>> 5.9, but if newer versions fall down that's Oracle's fault, not gcc's.
>
> Since this is a purely gcc 4.7.2 bootstrapped with gcc 4.5.1 as the compiler then it would be
> entirely in GCC land and not Oracle.

Except that the system headers which declare the problem function come
from Oracle.  And that doesn't answer the question.