From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-64398-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 87576 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2019 21:25:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 87562 invoked by uid 89); 16 Nov 2019 21:25:32 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*f:sk:CAH6eHd, U*jwakely.gcc, jwakelygccgmailcom, jwakely.gcc@gmail.com
X-HELO: mail-il1-f182.google.com
Received: from mail-il1-f182.google.com (HELO mail-il1-f182.google.com) (209.85.166.182) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 21:25:31 +0000
Received: by mail-il1-f182.google.com with SMTP id n18so12384749ilt.9        for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 13:25:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id         :subject:to:cc;        bh=EvjwtArGhtalkl7ad9G1BC8l0p3G4WTQC2xaju40h08=;        b=n24JwLjPf4s+hHA7qrpnazgSG4eO8XLSsRDw5Wj0X9hFPI0DO1jfOY02pTnLC5o3ww         0uEaa2c/1WdPPGARhQDFSVPrqeKtyNWtpaYR6WUecB4TMuZ7L90toBeK7BBmgL/chKnn         /VceKXwn0ruF8wYsHfKc1dgOjJmH9qtI9+syP8vAR/BooeRM84Y3T/eG4WqGabH8/U0n         Z66Qz1hasUVuWjr/C4ZBBRyWtKRreuQkjeMHfCOSsUZF7uz4rYJd9h29khWAhNrVX3N0         iQW2ZvlNHFFg//beHBMP90CCHrb0L8cErOVnsBLEhkPViLPJuJLQx5ziNdH2Pth26oWS         35rg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAH8yC8nKtqGNeKz9mopFBq0eT-hLMcyvi6TW34F6XF835VuE_A@mail.gmail.com> <20191116112543.GY16031@gate.crashing.org> <CAH8yC8ngMxwZNqYgVt+O5TzZo92e+HoEqSXUks=yGKExQmiN-A@mail.gmail.com> <20191116142653.GZ16031@gate.crashing.org> <CAH8yC8nKx6Qm+Fo-ghTckSODkSKbyCGWZm5DR6J5q1crkVmpAQ@mail.gmail.com> <20191116174122.GB16031@gate.crashing.org> <CAH6eHdSd8Muxux1pWV5NiOe1KT8uuRhznuAMsvrDtDrONZtu5g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdSd8Muxux1pWV5NiOe1KT8uuRhznuAMsvrDtDrONZtu5g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: noloader@gmail.com
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 21:25:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8k2UPqxzWTsZkNTD59JxSA5AizEZJYYDpw_KTRJ0+zqVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: GCC 7 on ppc64le does not recognize vec_xl_be?
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-help <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2019-11/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2

On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 1:26 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>  ...
> I already sent the following to Jeffrey 8 hours ago (off-list, because
> I could only send HTML mail at the time):
>
> "Those are the docs for GCC trunk. That function is not listed in the
> docs for GCC 7."

GCC tells me it supports the load by accepting -mcpu=power9 and
defining _ARCH_PWR9.

The problems with GCC seem to be a little larger then inaccurate docs.

Jeff