From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23098 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2013 16:12:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23085 invoked by uid 89); 25 Sep 2013 16:12:18 -0000 Received: from na3sys009aog116.obsmtp.com (HELO na3sys009aog116.obsmtp.com) (74.125.149.240) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:12:18 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: na3sys009aog116.obsmtp.com Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob116.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUkMLX2aWNf+X3AuuoUeXL7NxyMsCZRB+@postini.com; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:12:17 PDT Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id wn1so6950200obc.38 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:12:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ctfJY/tDZF3m4K2P5JFjwWEiGNO98YrS4YV7DkpIVG8=; b=N+6gkLQeDR6sCYtLPTqGtU0upQpb5XyNJjQi6CG+T2htgtxtJqtjTl3Pug5qppoTUD yq4zRkgXQy3N3xDDZj4J0XzYN7nQ/T18Nux8UCBRQoAHr6bT+aglrI/YGd2dWlLwUhb6 sC4AxPiKYdfN1RIpGfEQ1QtfyzwMSgxOumOvmNti9SYglG8q2hDaQclTKx3TLiqrxlcg 5g+lv2adWP3NepOw5REZxHfc9+w99hGnzVz1XULE+nSUCviu3cTVU0a0XJbQEpeZ55hJ VVfko+UxHVCSA2cLdNHGaBugXlMIq2c6yuWy+tj774O2zCC1zzL7U7JUzhlzPti1xEdy tHgg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQniR9UpE6IKl1A0UWEJWqK5DidpgCqIJPKCFLWitRg07K7KJmtYW+pQQJhJdz042qX2+Rtw MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.60.105 with SMTP id g9mr30940743oer.8.1380125534605; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.215.13 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:12:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20130925155057.GA10422@xvii.vinc17.org> <19EB96622A777C4AB91610E763265F462BB245@SJEXCHMB14.corp.ad.broadcom.com> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problems with GCC's Bugzilla? From: Dave Allured - NOAA Affiliate To: "gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00178.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Dave Allured - NOAA Affiliate wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Paulo Matos wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On >>> Behalf Of Vincent Lefevre >>> Sent: 25 September 2013 16:51 >>> To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org >>> Subject: Problems with GCC's Bugzilla? >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Am I the only one having problems with GCC's Bugzilla? Either empty >>> pages or empty CSS (with Firefox) or server error (with Chromium). >>> Actually I could reproduce these problems only on the following page: >>> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21718 >>> >>> Other pages don't seem to be affected. >> >> >> My firefox (Windows 24.0) doesn't like that page either. Weird! >> >> I have no explanation for it. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21718 > > Displays correctly for me in Safari 6.0.5 on Mac OS 10.8.5 (x86_64). > If someone (not me) wants to analyze the page source code, I can > capture it and send it to you. Er, never mind, I see that a likely suspect was just identified. --Dave