public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tadeus Prastowo <tadeus.prastowo@unitn.it>
To: Peter Breuer <ptb@inv.it.uc3m.es>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>,
	David Brown <david@westcontrol.com>, 	lh_mouse <lh_mouse@126.com>,
	gcc-help <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: signed/unsigned integer conversion for right shift seems
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 17:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN-HRFZRbty7PjGrxU3Ou1uU1ePDVxojkGQkd1wJB6gOBhz--A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201802071725.w17HPBlE003682@nbd.it.uc3m.es>

On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Peter T. Breuer <ptb@inv.it.uc3m.es> wrote:
> "Also sprach Jonathan Wakely:"
>>
>> On 7 February 2018 at 16:34, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
>> > I'll repeat the paragraph from my summary this morning.
>>
>> Please don't, your sophistry is still off-topic. Repeating it doesn't
>
> Kindly explain why explaining is off-topic in your opinion.
>
>> make it any less so.
>
>  Sophistry \Soph"ist*ry\, n. [OE. sophistrie, OF. sophisterie.]
>  The art or process of reasoning; logic. [Obs.] [1913 Webster]
>
> Correct. I am exact, which is the minimum anyone can be.

Good.  Now since you claimed that you were a mathematical logician in
one of the previous e-mails, I will let you know as a newcomer in this
mailing list that the set of axioms in this mailing list that you keep
posting to includes the proposition that said that "a discussion on
the C language issue is disallowed", another proposition that said
that "if a discussion is about a C language issue, then the discussion
is off-topic", and another proposition that said that "an off-topic
discussion shall not be discussed any longer."

So, can't you stop now, please, you who claimed to be
http://dblp.uni-trier.de/pers/hd/b/Breuer:Peter_T= ?

--
Best regards,
Tadeus

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-07 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-06 15:03 signed/unsigned integer conversion for right shift seems against C99 rule Peter Breuer
2018-02-06 15:21 ` Tadeus Prastowo
2018-02-06 15:29   ` signed/unsigned integer conversion for right shift seems against Peter T. Breuer
2018-02-06 15:38     ` Tadeus Prastowo
2018-02-06 16:17       ` Peter T. Breuer
2018-02-06 15:22 ` signed/unsigned integer conversion for right shift seems against C99 rule Liu Hao
2018-02-06 15:31   ` David Brown
2018-02-06 15:50   ` signed/unsigned integer conversion for right shift seems Peter T. Breuer
2018-02-06 15:57     ` Jonathan Wakely
2018-02-06 16:42       ` Peter T. Breuer
2018-02-06 16:45         ` Jonathan Wakely
2018-02-06 17:19           ` Peter T. Breuer
2018-02-06 17:35             ` Jonathan Wakely
2018-02-06 18:23               ` Peter T. Breuer
2018-02-06 18:27                 ` Jonathan Wakely
2018-02-06 18:37                   ` Tadeus Prastowo
2018-02-06 18:47                     ` Jonathan Wakely
2018-02-06 19:43                       ` Peter T. Breuer
2018-02-06 20:08                         ` Tadeus Prastowo
2018-02-06 20:15                           ` Jonathan Wakely
2018-02-07  9:59                             ` Peter T. Breuer
2018-02-07 12:28                               ` David Brown
     [not found]                                 ` <201802071634.w17GYiEL000904@nbd.it.uc3m.es>
2018-02-07 16:39                                   ` Jonathan Wakely
2018-02-07 17:25                                     ` Peter T. Breuer
2018-02-07 17:39                                       ` Jonathan Wakely
2018-02-07 18:32                                         ` Peter T. Breuer
2018-02-07 18:41                                           ` Jonathan Wakely
2018-02-07 17:39                                       ` Tadeus Prastowo [this message]
2018-02-07 18:50                                         ` Peter T. Breuer
2018-02-07 18:11                                       ` Jonathan Wakely
2018-02-06 19:28                   ` Peter T. Breuer
2018-02-06 20:11                     ` Jonathan Wakely
2018-02-06 23:49                       ` Peter T. Breuer
2018-02-07  2:04                         ` Vincent Lefevre
2018-02-07  9:30                           ` Peter T. Breuer
2018-02-06 21:18                 ` Chris Hall
2018-02-06 17:44             ` Tadeus Prastowo
2018-02-06 19:00               ` Peter T. Breuer
2018-02-06 15:22 ` signed/unsigned integer conversion for right shift seems against C99 rule Alexander Monakov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAN-HRFZRbty7PjGrxU3Ou1uU1ePDVxojkGQkd1wJB6gOBhz--A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tadeus.prastowo@unitn.it \
    --cc=david@westcontrol.com \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=lh_mouse@126.com \
    --cc=ptb@inv.it.uc3m.es \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).