From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lj1-f180.google.com (mail-lj1-f180.google.com [209.85.208.180]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FD7D385042E for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 03:59:08 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 1FD7D385042E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kegel.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=daniel.r.kegel@gmail.com Received: by mail-lj1-f180.google.com with SMTP id z14so11987432ljm.1 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:59:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3yGrQtl3WPPPTmfSXenJWNuVxT9//P0EBHWxy6HSAsA=; b=jcFQfhLjXTj2K2P/iUBAMc260MJKalxUewIzwjvrNwVHyNH5Uzfj81xXa1uonLjXYo w/opKXFy7u8lxYb6ktq2NCTl0/GZAadvqY6IeyOOgpIt7jm+glL8aePygBfX1yWACth+ mvPRbBADxhhIMXedorly48a/wHP8Ut+HINap/334wiJZRJ7k/G23h4JlvzBjrng+2Wp3 jmvtQAy9HwgxgaQX4O2qNr/K/vcWkEpAPfUU/8xcKDXxtrFI4DOpY5611gCcqDwXQ9bU aToNUv458lwu/vyfHX1v3poYNP08iLOomGmWDzXqLyQ7raOqhyG+anqA4YjQt28E0+q3 M2hg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ZNyCWyCKOU50kjL8Vbb/yu8nBHUa/9LRpzpYWHmSuiP38bJKC ACb0KDZJQIrkNjmE+ueeDmRvcHGIOo4BJcdWnVw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwegYNynYH1lpXvsQazBFckwHIMDsZoStrLuqExgY8ROSNrs0xJRHbkM1z84RVUyqsbfydxXnukeVoTEo6MwqM= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:86d5:: with SMTP id n21mr1976901ljj.188.1597118346693; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:59:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dan Kegel Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:58:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is realloc(3) permitted to fail when shrinking a block? To: =?UTF-8?B?5a2Z5LiW6b6ZIHN1bnNoaWxvbmc=?= Cc: gcc-help X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, BODY_8BITS, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-help mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 03:59:09 -0000 If the heap's corrupt, yes, it can fail... On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:54 PM =E5=AD=99=E4=B8=96=E9=BE=99 sunshilong via = Gcc-help < gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > As the subject, I couldn't find any positive or negative statements > about this matter in the Linux Programmer's Manual. > > Could somebody shed some light on this matter? > > Thank you for your attention to this matter. > Best regards. > Sunshilong > >