* Re: mno-eabi option on powerpc-elf
[not found] ` <mcry5wt77tn.fsf@coign.corp.google.com>
@ 2011-10-10 7:38 ` Rohit Arul Raj
2011-10-10 13:07 ` Rohit Arul Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rohit Arul Raj @ 2011-10-10 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
> Rohit Arul Raj <rohitarulraj@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I am working with powerpc-elf tool chain v4.5.2 (with newlib).
>>
>> I need some clarification regarding the -mno-eabi option. From the GCC
>> docs, this option means that the tool chain does not adhere to EABI.
>>
>> -mno-eabi:
>> On System V.4 and embedded PowerPC systems do not adhere to
>> the Embedded Applications Binary Interface (eabi) which is a set of
>> modifications to the System V.4 specifications.
>>
>> Does that mean if i use '-mno-eabi', it will adhere to System V.4
>> specs completely like the 'powerpc-linux' tool chain?
>
> This question would be more appropriate for the mailing list
> gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org. Please take any followups to gcc-help. Thanks.
>
> Yes, using -mno-eabi should give you an ABI identical to standard System
> V.4.
>
> Ian
>
Thanks Ian.
Also it has been mentioned in the gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c that "A
happy side-effect is that '-mno-eabi' libraries can be used with
'-meabi' programs". i also see the 'newlib' built with '-mno-eabi'
option.
Is using 'mno-eabi' libs with 'meabi' program conforms to ABI standard?
Thanks,
Rohit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: mno-eabi option on powerpc-elf
2011-10-10 7:38 ` mno-eabi option on powerpc-elf Rohit Arul Raj
@ 2011-10-10 13:07 ` Rohit Arul Raj
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rohit Arul Raj @ 2011-10-10 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Rohit Arul Raj <rohitarulraj@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
>> Rohit Arul Raj <rohitarulraj@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> I am working with powerpc-elf tool chain v4.5.2 (with newlib).
>>>
>>> I need some clarification regarding the -mno-eabi option. From the GCC
>>> docs, this option means that the tool chain does not adhere to EABI.
>>>
>>> -mno-eabi:
>>> On System V.4 and embedded PowerPC systems do not adhere to
>>> the Embedded Applications Binary Interface (eabi) which is a set of
>>> modifications to the System V.4 specifications.
>>>
>>> Does that mean if i use '-mno-eabi', it will adhere to System V.4
>>> specs completely like the 'powerpc-linux' tool chain?
>>
>> This question would be more appropriate for the mailing list
>> gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org. Please take any followups to gcc-help. Thanks.
>>
>> Yes, using -mno-eabi should give you an ABI identical to standard System
>> V.4.
>>
>> Ian
>>
>
> Thanks Ian.
>
> Also it has been mentioned in the gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c that "A
> happy side-effect is that '-mno-eabi' libraries can be used with
> '-meabi' programs". i also see the 'newlib' built with '-mno-eabi'
> option.
>
> Is using 'mno-eabi' libs with 'meabi' program conforms to ABI standard?
>
> Thanks,
> Rohit
>
Got the following links which says they are compatible.
http://www.rtems.com/ml/rtems-users/2002/may/msg00136.html
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.newlib/1681
Please let me know otherwise.
Thanks,
Rohit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-10 13:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CAPVMLfWBhQFjmMjo=KJ3zJz5=FMdJ-ZzPjFVpDkGyLQS97-2+A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAPVMLfXdPc0-rvKzen79MwZJDEU6SFiz+tofu8o9XfNfko3kfA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <mcry5wt77tn.fsf@coign.corp.google.com>
2011-10-10 7:38 ` mno-eabi option on powerpc-elf Rohit Arul Raj
2011-10-10 13:07 ` Rohit Arul Raj
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).