From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=Q0GH=37=gmail.com=leonleon77@sourceware.org>
Received: from mail-pf1-x42f.google.com (mail-pf1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0ADD3858D37
	for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu,  1 Dec 2022 04:52:11 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org E0ADD3858D37
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com
Received: by mail-pf1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id k79so792359pfd.7
        for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 20:52:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
        h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject
         :date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=V5Mja+BZ5ixK3eOj2Ed3YrrS7BOkgfQF9mvwAv7qxjE=;
        b=gH1fADY5Yo48ZjszLu9LT3d0UUmmPdVJDtf91yTWIJDnIMCJQrEMh0BHRiU3TQofQh
         Bwpti8B1ciDG4kQT+vZN4EHHFAv6Y7AUBFQM3b0PB5L3KTGW72+AhNXlPh/ArIbNEehz
         6c9L7hXvmwMjbMCtVopZQiBVLgjGsdKUVQ4IiOQurUVPwBNOQZHCo4nOKaBQFmCqU7jG
         UozJ8VQK7K+Bl8DQjW7+3sSI3WhwkHZGGtPs/zfoz/V6f0qQT/vMHANLtWKaSUyKiAtp
         LJGR03Mazw4HBDhB0eY/DKPrL4MyXKp2DG2YWFc2yMCiBSFJgXeZ16vajzvVwTFrUEgk
         CFTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state
         :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=V5Mja+BZ5ixK3eOj2Ed3YrrS7BOkgfQF9mvwAv7qxjE=;
        b=rVv/1uqexu09axn19guhliFqIpsT44LnsHNFCoujFHeti9D8jn2FwRSdHxsfXGLchM
         FFB7iH/DZl/2+LOhEg/zsL5KpdVhQvLJj6c7odIPVXqQohnbA1rwSm173R+P/XFeqrOF
         n4dQG22inl0GIfKnwRzwecp39NkIkf/G0pDkt9hfan232ySi0x//z6W+yKyQtlIiL6XT
         qxZvlewPpNSevGkX9zBPPf+jy7JiCw5kwcf9UzEJYGp5aGx8esxrfYx2IU3OfTGpNVdy
         6QhYUq+KILbW2eVUmaNbaD0rNqBK+gnYV8n2sPufLLMGMc+cNpPziE6e9b20NlxL4sDx
         NYRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pl7Eg8xJRxgStZNzVCB/4psBiQDLrjMR6clET/dfA55X2fZyryH
	z429B+ubOaDlTmb9H6tlw5WbJZP9Ya/PcJROxDxWWUNDMKA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6hU2g3CabChALDa6SB9cuQLtULztFq6sOGh6jgga+noQ/siR1YaKU6neFQthCxjl4qDbrn4HXAU7r1eN9xWlI=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:81d8:0:b0:561:c694:80b with SMTP id
 c24-20020aa781d8000000b00561c694080bmr46050484pfn.47.1669870330618; Wed, 30
 Nov 2022 20:52:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: leon zadorin <leonleon77@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 15:51:58 +1100
Message-ID: <CAPpySAbkd8_tZ2DXBJbbgaAWYtrEXoi65Litt16ApVNWeTvATw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: which compiler is right (either to compile or to barf)...
To: gcc-help <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e0acfc05eebcfb72"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>

--000000000000e0acfc05eebcfb72
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi everyone,

I would be interested to hear the opinions of C++ standard experts on which
compiler is correctly dealing with the below code (GCC 12.2 -std=c++20
 compiles fine, MSVC19.33 /std:c++20 compiles fine, Clang 15.0.0 -std=c++20
barfs)


#include <memory>
#include <vector>
#include <optional>

struct X;

template <typename T>
struct J {
    typedef typename T::x aoeu;
};

struct S {
    ::std::vector<::std::shared_ptr<J<X>>> v;
};

static ::std::optional<S> opt;

struct X {
    typedef int x;
};

int main () {
}

Clang barfs with: incomplete type 'X' named in nested name specifier
typedef typename T::x aoeu

Interestingly if S::v is not a vector, i.e. instead of
::std::vector<::std::shared_ptr<J<X>>> v;
v is just
::std::shared_ptr<J<X>> v;

... then clang compiles fine.

Also, if optional is replaced with say unique_ptr, clang also builds fine.

I would be interested in being educated on the standard (of which I am not
a lawyer :) ) what would be the correctly mandated behavior?

Kind regards
Leon.

--000000000000e0acfc05eebcfb72--