public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Edgar Mobile <heideggm@hotmail.com>
To: Navid Rahimi <navidrahimi@microsoft.com>,
	"gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Try to understand output of -fdump-ipa-inline
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 08:10:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM8PR16MB4357C813172AD7362285FAEDC78E9@DM8PR16MB4357.namprd16.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR21MB15408E1E2EA71599B6531256A38F9@CY4PR21MB1540.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>

I tried to create a *.so example from it for which I literally copied the calling and called function. It is inlined correctly.

In the original project, g++ seems to be determined to create a plt entry for the to-be-inlined function although I gave it the visibility=hidden attribute (also -fvisibility=hidden in the g++ parameters).

Will a plt entry prevent a function from being inlined?
Is there a way to find out why g++ creates a plt entry although I'm trying to prevent this?

Regards

________________________________
From: Navid Rahimi <navidrahimi@microsoft.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2022 6:27 PM
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Edgar Mobile <heideggm@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Try to understand output of -fdump-ipa-inline

Have you tried to make a similar example? What I do in this situation is try to replicate exact situation but in a smaller case.

Inlining decision happens in multiple levels. It is hard to find out what is the exact reason this way.

Just as experiment, try it with always_inline [1] too.

1. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html



Best wishes,
Navid.

________________________________________
From: Gcc-help <gcc-help-bounces+navidrahimi=microsoft.com@gcc.gnu.org> on behalf of Edgar Mobile via Gcc-help <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2022 06:56
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Try to understand output of -fdump-ipa-inline

Greetings,

I try to find out why a function (inline keyword, defined in header) is not inlined. Example for -fdump-ipa-inline output:

Considering void Vertex::update(const Data&)/5927 with 40 size
 to be inlined into void SomeClass::updatePoly(const Data&, Polyline&)/11181 in /somepath/SomeClass.cpp:663
 Estimated badness is -0.000083, frequency 4.69.

The function is never inlined. unfortunately, the code is proprietary, so I cannot post everything.

Can anyone explain me the message above to find out why?
Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-20  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-19 13:56 Edgar Mobile
2022-07-19 18:27 ` Navid Rahimi
2022-07-20  8:10   ` Edgar Mobile [this message]
2022-07-20 19:35     ` Navid Rahimi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM8PR16MB4357C813172AD7362285FAEDC78E9@DM8PR16MB4357.namprd16.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=heideggm@hotmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=navidrahimi@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).