* Preprocessor
@ 2001-03-11 14:52 Jean-Pierre Schwickerath
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jean-Pierre Schwickerath @ 2001-03-11 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GCC-List
Hello,
I solved my problem with the re_max_failures by compiling a static version of
gcc 2.95.0 without libstdc++ and used it to compile a shared version of the
recent snapshot.
But I have a few packages who complain that the following construction is not
valid.
printf("%*s",
#ifdef ARGUMENT
16,
#else
8,
#endif
"");
However if the guys wrote it this way(for example in the gnu binutils) then
it's because it was valid.
Is there a change in the pre 3.0 version of gcc that makes this stuctor illegal
now?
Or is there just on of my packages that is not up-to-date and everything's all
right with the preprocessor?
Jean-Pierre
--
Jean-Pierre Schwickerath - Powered by GNU/LinuX!
E-Mail: email@schwicky.net - http://schwicky.net
PGP Key ID: 0x48C39212 - AIM: Schwicky - ICQ's UIN: 4690141
Nothing's impossible... Everything is relative!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2001-03-11 14:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-03-11 14:52 Preprocessor Jean-Pierre Schwickerath
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).