From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Jean-Pierre Schwickerath" <gcc-list@schwicky.net>
To: "GCC-List" <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Preprocessor
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:52:00 -0000
Message-id: <E14cEg9-0002cq-00@mrvdom02.schlund.de>
X-SW-Source: 2001-03/msg00085.html

Hello, 

I solved my problem with the re_max_failures by compiling a static version of
gcc 2.95.0 without libstdc++ and used it to compile a shared version of the
recent snapshot. 
But I have a few packages who complain that the following construction is not
valid.
printf("%*s", 
#ifdef ARGUMENT
	16,
#else
	8,
#endif
	"");

However if the guys wrote it this way(for example in the gnu binutils) then
it's because it was valid. 
Is there a change in the pre 3.0 version of gcc that makes this stuctor illegal
now?
Or is there just on of my packages that is not up-to-date and everything's all
right with the preprocessor?


Jean-Pierre

-- 
Jean-Pierre Schwickerath - Powered by GNU/LinuX!
E-Mail: email@schwicky.net - http://schwicky.net
PGP Key ID: 0x48C39212 - AIM: Schwicky - ICQ's UIN: 4690141

Nothing's impossible... Everything is relative!