From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-9475-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17300 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2002 08:09:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17293 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2002 08:09:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO asa.co.uk) (193.119.169.33)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jul 2002 08:09:31 -0000
Received: from mailgate.asa.co.uk ([193.119.169.66] helo=bentley.asa.co.uk)
	by asa.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #2)
	id 17Rpwn-0004dV-00; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:02:09 +0100
Received: from jamin.bentley.asa.co.uk
	([192.168.10.112] helo=there ident=paulb)
	by bentley.asa.co.uk with smtp (Exim 2.05 #3)
	id 17Rpwk-0004dT-00; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:02:06 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Paul Butcher <paul.butcher@asa.co.uk>
Organization: ASA Ltd.
To: "Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci" <fwyzard@inwind.it>,
 gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Problem with C++ on gcc 3
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 01:09:00 -0000
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020704123900.00b29448@localhost> <5.1.0.14.2.20020708170113.00b4d068@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020708170113.00b4d068@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <E17Rpwk-0004dT-00@bentley.asa.co.uk>
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2

For clarity I built gcc 3.1 from source for Win32/cygwin but have confirmed 
the behaviour against gcc 3.0.4 built for LInux for SuSE8.0.  

Paul Butcher
Alton, Hants, UK

On Monday 08 Jul 2002 16:03, Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci wrote:
>
> At 09:50 08/07/2002 +0100, Paul Butcher wrote:
> >Thanks for the obvious answer - my problem was two-fold:
> >1.  using gcc instead of g++ as you stated: -lstdc++ is not included in
> > the linker stage.
> >Why does gcc 3.1 not allow this?  gcc 2.95.x included the correct
> > libraries when calling gcc.
>
> Didn't know it did that :-)
>
> >2.  I also had gcc 2.95.3 installed in a different path and libstdc++ was
> >being found there before the new 3.1 library.
> >Why does the library path used by gcc not start with its installation
> >libraries rather than generic paths like /usr/lib?
>
> It depends on how you installed GCC:
> if you installed a precompiled binary from a package, the fault is of the
> packager;
> if you bootstrapped from source, the fault is probably GCC's installation
> procedure's.
>
> fwyzard