* gcc 2.95.3 basic_string::Rep::operator delete unresolved
@ 2001-06-22 4:20 Fritz Stauffer
2001-06-23 0:19 ` Alexandre Oliva
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fritz Stauffer @ 2001-06-22 4:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
I have a linux to power pc cross-compiler with gcc.2.95.3 and
David Korn's patches. The generated code has the following
undefined symbol:
basic_string<char, string_char_traits<char>, __default_alloc_template
<true, 0> >::Rep::operator delete(void *)
Any ideas how to fix this?
Thanks,
Fritz Stauffer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: gcc 2.95.3 basic_string::Rep::operator delete unresolved
2001-06-22 4:20 gcc 2.95.3 basic_string::Rep::operator delete unresolved Fritz Stauffer
@ 2001-06-23 0:19 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-06-23 7:15 ` Fritz Stauffer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Oliva @ 2001-06-23 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fritz Stauffer; +Cc: gcc-help
On Jun 22, 2001, Fritz Stauffer <fstauffe@aoc.nrao.edu> wrote:
> basic_string<char, string_char_traits<char>, __default_alloc_template
> <true, 0> >::Rep::operator delete(void *)
> Any ideas how to fix this?
Are you linking with g++ or gcc?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: gcc 2.95.3 basic_string::Rep::operator delete unresolved
2001-06-23 0:19 ` Alexandre Oliva
@ 2001-06-23 7:15 ` Fritz Stauffer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fritz Stauffer @ 2001-06-23 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre Oliva; +Cc: Fritz Stauffer, gcc-help
>
> > basic_string<char, string_char_traits<char>, __default_alloc_template
> > <true, 0> >::Rep::operator delete(void *)
>
> > Any ideas how to fix this?
>
> Are you linking with g++ or gcc?
>
This result is from gcc. I also tried g++ on C++ code, and the
basic_string::Rep::clone(void) is also unresolved. All the other
basic_string::Rep methods are Weak symbols.
I should mention that the power pc target is a VxWorks box.
Fritz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-06-23 7:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-06-22 4:20 gcc 2.95.3 basic_string::Rep::operator delete unresolved Fritz Stauffer
2001-06-23 0:19 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-06-23 7:15 ` Fritz Stauffer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).