* sibling call optimization
@ 2001-10-22 5:35 Morten Sylvest Olsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Morten Sylvest Olsen @ 2001-10-22 5:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
Hi all..
I'm trying to make a sibling call (or, rather making the GCC optimizer
make one) through a function pointer. This seems to be impossible?
I've read some old messages about the tailcall/siblingcalls that talked
about implementing an explicit __attribute__ or similar construct to tell
gcc to make a sibling call. This was never implemented, or?
Without knowing much about gcc internals, it seems to be this part of
gcc/calls.c responsible:
/* If the register holding the address is a callee saved
register, then we lose. We have no way to prevent that,
so we only allow calls to named functions. */
/* ??? This could be done by having the insn constraints
use a register class that is all call-clobbered. Any
reload insns generated to fix things up would appear
before the sibcall_epilogue. */
|| fndecl == NULL_TREE
Or maybe not, I've only looked at it very briefly.
- Morten
The only perfect science is hind-sight.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2001-10-22 5:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-10-22 5:35 sibling call optimization Morten Sylvest Olsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).