From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-14560-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10996 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2003 15:13:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10100 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2003 15:12:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.oktet.ru) (193.125.193.3)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2003 15:12:33 -0000
Received: from mail.oktet.ru (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.oktet.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA5FCVUL013471;
	Wed, 5 Nov 2003 18:12:31 +0300
Received: from localhost (sdv@localhost)
	by mail.oktet.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id hA5FC8sI013465;
	Wed, 5 Nov 2003 18:12:08 +0300
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.oktet.ru: sdv owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 15:13:00 -0000
From: Dmitry Semyonov <Dmitry.Semyonov@oktet.ru>
X-X-Sender:  <sdv@mail.oktet.ru>
Reply-To: <Dmitry.Semyonov@oktet.ru>
To: <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
cc: <crossgcc@sources.redhat.com>, <binutils@sources.redhat.co>
Subject: Re: arm-wince-pe objdump does not disassemble .text section
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0311051754010.11699-100000@mail.oktet.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0311051810110.11699-100000@mail.oktet.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2

On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Dmitry Semyonov wrote:

Sorry, I've forgotten the versions:
binutils-2.14
gcc-core-3.4-20031029

> I've compiled binutils/gcc for arm-wince-pe target.
> Using the tools I'm trying to compile sample file probe.c with the
> following function:
>
> int foo(int a)
> {
>     return a * 2;
> }
>
> Then I'm doing arm-wince-pe-objdump -d probe.o
> and seeing only the following line:
>
> probe.o:     file format pe-arm-little
>
> Where is the disassembled instructions?
> Is it a bug in binutils, or may be I misunderstand something?


...Bye..Dmitry.