From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29331 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2002 17:48:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29294 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2002 17:48:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Mar 2002 17:48:20 -0000 Received: from pali.cps.cmich.edu ([141.209.131.81]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16qHWy-0008Nn-00 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 12:48:16 -0500 Received: from localhost (ishwar@localhost) by pali.cps.cmich.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2RI8B932501 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 13:08:11 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:48:00 -0000 From: Ish Rattan To: "'help-gcc@gnu.org'" Subject: Re: FW: SPARC-Solaris 8 gcc-3.0 In-Reply-To: <999F6F1E8EB8D311AC190090277A77260C4863AD@axcs08.cos.agilent.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00198.txt.bz2 It is there, one can have gcc (32/64 bit) binary that will produce 64-bit binaries. Problem is gdb-5.1 does not understand them :-( -ishwar On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, KILAYKO-DOMINGO,LEE (Non-A-Americas,ex1) wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: KILAYKO-DOMINGO,LEE (Non-A-Americas,ex1) > > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:51 AM > > To: 'gnu@gnu.org' > > Subject: SPARC-Solaris 8 gcc-3.0 > > > > Hello - > > > > Does the SPARC-Solaris 8 distribution of gcc-3.0 have 64-bit support? > > > > Thank you. > > > > Lee Kilayko-Domingo > > Agilent Technologies > > 4775 Centennial Blvd. > > Colorado Springs, CO 80919 > > (719) 522-8605 > > >