From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24113 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2002 05:52:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24104 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2002 05:52:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO slartibartfast.mex) (216.27.160.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Jun 2002 05:52:30 -0000 Received: from slartibartfast.mex (epotter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slartibartfast.mex (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g5U5kAT6026110 for ; Sun, 30 Jun 2002 01:46:10 -0400 Received: from localhost (epotter@localhost) by slartibartfast.mex (8.12.4/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id g5U5kAaQ026107 for ; Sun, 30 Jun 2002 01:46:10 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: slartibartfast.mex: epotter owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 22:52:00 -0000 From: Elliott Potter X-X-Sender: epotter@slartibartfast.mex To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: 64-bit gcc3.1 on Solaris? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00257.txt.bz2 Has anyone tried to compile gcc 3.1 as 64 bit on Solaris 2.8 or 2.9? I got it compiled as 32 bit no problem (twice actually) and it does appear to compile working 64 bit programs, but just for the heck of it I thought I'd try to compile the compiler with the -m64 option. Yea, I can't get that to work. Anyway I thought I'd test the waters and see if anyone thought this was worth bothering with before I sent a mega-post with configure lines and error messages and such. I guess that I should point out that I'm using a basically default Solaris 2.9 installation (including the solaris ld and as) but I'm attempting to use the gcc 3.1 I bootstrapped to build the 64 bit gcc. Eh? If there are any takers I'll send the mega-post with helpful messages. Thanks -- Elliott