public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* IDEs
@ 2003-02-26  2:54 Samuel T. Santos
  2003-02-26  3:02 ` IDEs Samuel T. Santos
  2003-02-26  3:28 ` IDEs Bharathi S
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Samuel T. Santos @ 2003-02-26  2:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: GCC-Help

Good night peoples!

	I want some opinions of use IDEs to programming in C and C++ with GCC
3.2.2?
	Its good for learn?
	if yes, what IDEs are goods to use?

	I try use dev-c++ 0.07 alpha for Linux... but if I don't installed
wrong... its doesn't work, neither open the enviroment.

	well... I see in the C++ Programming How-To, some IDEs but necessary
its for use gcc...

	Thanks in advanced,

		Sams

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: IDEs
  2003-02-26  2:54 IDEs Samuel T. Santos
@ 2003-02-26  3:02 ` Samuel T. Santos
  2003-02-26  3:26   ` IDEs Samuel T. Santos
  2003-02-26  3:28 ` IDEs Bharathi S
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Samuel T. Santos @ 2003-02-26  3:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: GCC-Help

just to correct what I tell

	I see in the C++ Programming How-To some IDEs, but not necessary its
use or its supports gcc... isn't? specially gcc 3.2.2?

:)

Em Ter, 2003-02-25 às 23:55, Samuel T. Santos escreveu:
> Good night peoples!
> 
> 	I want some opinions of use IDEs to programming in C and C++ with GCC
> 3.2.2?
> 	Its good for learn?
> 	if yes, what IDEs are goods to use?
> 
> 	I try use dev-c++ 0.07 alpha for Linux... but if I don't installed
> wrong... its doesn't work, neither open the enviroment.
> 
> 	well... I see in the C++ Programming How-To, some IDEs but necessary
> its for use gcc...
> 
> 	Thanks in advanced,
> 
> 		Sams
> 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: IDEs
  2003-02-26  3:02 ` IDEs Samuel T. Santos
@ 2003-02-26  3:26   ` Samuel T. Santos
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Samuel T. Santos @ 2003-02-26  3:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: GCC-Help

look at this link I found:

http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-1999-06/lw-06-vcontrol_1.html


Em Qua, 2003-02-26 às 00:04, Samuel T. Santos escreveu:
> just to correct what I tell
> 
> 	I see in the C++ Programming How-To some IDEs, but not necessary its
> use or its supports gcc... isn't? specially gcc 3.2.2?
> 
> :)
> 
> Em Ter, 2003-02-25 às 23:55, Samuel T. Santos escreveu:
> > Good night peoples!
> > 
> > 	I want some opinions of use IDEs to programming in C and C++ with GCC
> > 3.2.2?
> > 	Its good for learn?
> > 	if yes, what IDEs are goods to use?
> > 
> > 	I try use dev-c++ 0.07 alpha for Linux... but if I don't installed
> > wrong... its doesn't work, neither open the enviroment.
> > 
> > 	well... I see in the C++ Programming How-To, some IDEs but necessary
> > its for use gcc...
> > 
> > 	Thanks in advanced,
> > 
> > 		Sams
> > 
> 
> 
> 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: IDEs
  2003-02-26  2:54 IDEs Samuel T. Santos
  2003-02-26  3:02 ` IDEs Samuel T. Santos
@ 2003-02-26  3:28 ` Bharathi S
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bharathi S @ 2003-02-26  3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: GNU GCC

On 25 Feb 2003, Samuel T. Santos wrote:

Hi Samuel,

> I want some opinions of use IDEs to programming in C and C++ with
> GCC 3.2.2? Its good for learn?
 
  Anjutha/ Anjuata, seems to be good. Vim / GNU Emacs enough.

Bye :)
-- 
Bharathi S, IndLinuX Team, (__)
DONLab,     TeNeT Group,   oo /
IIT-Madras, Chennai-INDIA. (_/\

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-02-26  3:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-02-26  2:54 IDEs Samuel T. Santos
2003-02-26  3:02 ` IDEs Samuel T. Santos
2003-02-26  3:26   ` IDEs Samuel T. Santos
2003-02-26  3:28 ` IDEs Bharathi S

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).