From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ADAM Sulmicki To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: building latest ( snapshot || cvs ) Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 18:33:00 -0000 Message-id: References: X-SW-Source: 2000-02/msg00092.html > > I guess it is something wrong with 'configure' and HAVE_SYS_RESOURCE_H > > > This or other way, I have manually defined RUSAGE_CHILDREN to be -1 > > and included declaration of struct 'rusage' and it comiled past it. > > It looks more like some conflict between glibc and the kernel headers > you're using. Is there some easy way to find out for sure? I always found debugging configure scripts pain in ass. Looking into configure.log does not seems to give any conclusive information. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ADAM Sulmicki To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: building latest ( snapshot || cvs ) Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: X-SW-Source: 2000-q1/msg00286.html Message-ID: <20000401000000.S32DsAAJw01id4ROyeYw1VDtKkShVjUhfWcTAmjYx0s@z> > > I guess it is something wrong with 'configure' and HAVE_SYS_RESOURCE_H > > > This or other way, I have manually defined RUSAGE_CHILDREN to be -1 > > and included declaration of struct 'rusage' and it comiled past it. > > It looks more like some conflict between glibc and the kernel headers > you're using. Is there some easy way to find out for sure? I always found debugging configure scripts pain in ass. Looking into configure.log does not seems to give any conclusive information.