From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: BIONDI Philippe To: Stephen Frost Cc: BIONDI Philippe , gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: line size on C sources files Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 05:36:00 -0000 Message-id: References: X-SW-Source: 2000-03/msg00106.html On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Stephen Frost wrote: > Hrm, sounds like 'esqlc' is badly coded, yes, but I would question if > you actually *need* to have a 255+ line. :) > What about me wanting to expand macros before using esqlc (to use some macros in EXEC SQL sections) ? I don't control the size of my auto-generated C-SQL code. The question is : is this C-SQL code valid ? You and I think it is. The answer of the support is "put backslashes". (Well I must also say about the support that I spend 3 hours to explain them the two first lines of my mail. But that is another story ! :)) -- Philippe Biondi Systems administrator Webmotion Inc. http://www.webmotion.com mailto:philippe.biondi@webmotion.com Fax. (613) 260-9545 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: BIONDI Philippe To: Stephen Frost Cc: BIONDI Philippe , gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: line size on C sources files Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: X-SW-Source: 2000-q1/msg00416.html Message-ID: <20000401000000.CrmeiEVr8N0noZFBTa7Hw_oxArMOKwziXXmkdliEmZE@z> On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Stephen Frost wrote: > Hrm, sounds like 'esqlc' is badly coded, yes, but I would question if > you actually *need* to have a 255+ line. :) > What about me wanting to expand macros before using esqlc (to use some macros in EXEC SQL sections) ? I don't control the size of my auto-generated C-SQL code. The question is : is this C-SQL code valid ? You and I think it is. The answer of the support is "put backslashes". (Well I must also say about the support that I spend 3 hours to explain them the two first lines of my mail. But that is another story ! :)) -- Philippe Biondi Systems administrator Webmotion Inc. http://www.webmotion.com mailto:philippe.biondi@webmotion.com Fax. (613) 260-9545