From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-44538-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17605 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2011 20:41:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 17597 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Feb 2011 20:41:52 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from snt0-omc3-s22.snt0.hotmail.com (HELO snt0-omc3-s22.snt0.hotmail.com) (65.55.90.161)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:41:48 +0000
Received: from SNT106-W38 ([65.55.90.137]) by snt0-omc3-s22.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675);	 Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:41:46 -0800
Message-ID: <SNT106-W38A844009B0AB5C1712FDCABD20@phx.gbl>
From: Jason Mancini <jayrusman@hotmail.com>
To: <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
CC: <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: infinite for-loop and related question
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:37:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim=BeKq2wpiVs3DeouVqAc-QrgtnvSUSWSFRCZN@mail.gmail.com>
References: <SNT106-W3B382A5342E9FE1D26967ABD20@phx.gbl>,<AANLkTim=BeKq2wpiVs3DeouVqAc-QrgtnvSUSWSFRCZN@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2


> No. The C and C++ standards define that unsigned integers do not
> overflow, they wrap, with well-defined behaviour.

Aha, thank=A0 you!

Though I still find the output of this odd:

=A0 for (char i(1); i>0; ++i)=20
=A0=A0=A0 printf("%d %d\n", i, sizeof(i));

...
362195 1
362196 1
362197 1
...

For very large values of char!=A0 ^_^

Jason

=20=09=09=20=09=20=20=20=09=09=20=20