public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org>
To: gcc-help <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: WARNING: program timed out.
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 11:55:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b563a510-c646-dfbc-678b-eb9702078803@blastwave.org> (raw)



I have a four stage bootstrap that took a very very very long time to
complete.  Mostly due to the fact that I enabled code checks :


--enable-bootstrap --enable-stage1-languages=c,c++ \
--enable-checking=assert,misc,tree,gc,rtlflag,runtime,df,rtl,gcac,extra \
--enable-stage1-checking=assert,misc,tree,gc,rtlflag,runtime,df,rtl,gcac,extra 
\


So this was fun to let it run and it did run where time -p reports :

.
.
.
sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/sparcv8plus/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/cow-dir.o 
differs
sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/sparcv8plus/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/ops.o 
differs
sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/sparcv8plus/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/dir.o 
differs
sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/sparcv8plus/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/path.o 
differs
sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/sparcv8plus/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/cow-ops.o 
differs
sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/sparcv8plus/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fs_ops.o differs
sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/sparcv8plus/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fs_dir.o differs
sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/sparcv8plus/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/cow-fs_path.o 
differs
sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/sparcv8plus/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/cow-fs_dir.o 
differs
sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/sparcv8plus/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/cow-fs_ops.o 
differs
sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/sparcv8plus/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fs_path.o differs
gmake[2]: *** [Makefile:27282: compare3] Error 1
gmake[2]: Leaving directory 
'/opt/bw/build/gcc-9.2.0_SunOS5.10_sparc64vii+.003'
gmake[1]: *** [Makefile:27262: stage4-bubble] Error 2
gmake[1]: Leaving directory 
'/opt/bw/build/gcc-9.2.0_SunOS5.10_sparc64vii+.003'
gmake: *** [Makefile:27325: bootstrap4] Error 2

real 14078843.31
user 13593892.79
sys 437633.30
beta$

I was surprised to see stage 3 and stage 4 differ in any way given that
  stage 2 and stage 3 seemed perfect :


beta$
beta$ ls -ltrEin */xgcc */xg++
    4387682 -rwxr-xr-x   1 16411    20002    8106984 2019-11-16 
22:53:28.194322200 +0000 stage1-gcc/xgcc
    4388403 -rwxr-xr-x   1 16411    20002    8115680 2019-11-16 
22:53:50.102071100 +0000 stage1-gcc/xg++
    4723452 -rwxr-xr-x   1 16411    20002    10271968 2019-12-30 
20:32:32.671996900 +0000 stage2-gcc/xgcc
    4724042 -rwxr-xr-x   1 16411    20002    10284208 2019-12-30 
20:38:02.458504400 +0000 stage2-gcc/xg++
    4871655 -rwxr-xr-x   1 16411    20002    10271968 2020-02-22 
08:38:28.492670800 +0000 prev-gcc/xgcc
    4871806 -rwxr-xr-x   1 16411    20002    10284208 2020-02-22 
08:46:59.188336600 +0000 prev-gcc/xg++
    4455418 -rwxr-xr-x   1 16411    20002    10271952 2020-04-16 
04:10:05.877113800 +0000 gcc/xgcc
    4455567 -rwxr-xr-x   1 16411    20002    10284184 2020-04-16 
04:18:39.998805900 +0000 gcc/xg++
beta$

May as well let the testsuite run ... however I see a ton of :

.
.
.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
-funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  (test for 
excess errors)
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c   -O3 -g  (test for excess errors)
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c   -Os  (test for excess errors)
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c   -O2 -flto 
-flto-partition=none  (test for excess errors)
WARNING: program timed out.
.
.
.

I am guessing that there must be a "magic" testsuite incantation that
allows the tests to run as slowly as they wish?  Anyone know?



-- 
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard and suspenders optional

             reply	other threads:[~2020-05-06 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-06 11:55 Dennis Clarke [this message]
2020-05-06 23:15 ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b563a510-c646-dfbc-678b-eb9702078803@blastwave.org \
    --to=dclarke@blastwave.org \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).