From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27223 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2007 16:20:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 27180 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Dec 2007 16:20:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.229) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:20:27 +0000 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so1046588nzh for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:20:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.237.20 with SMTP id k20mr392227wfh.1197390022765; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:20:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.199.17 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:20:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:20:00 -0000 From: NightStrike To: "Martin Krischik" Subject: Re: GCC does not build gfortran !! Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200712080908.43409.krischik@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <765852.6744.qm@web51303.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <20071207162437.2vor9b2qpwosgkk0@server265-han.de-nserver.de> <200712080908.43409.krischik@users.sourceforge.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00222.txt.bz2 On 12/8/07, Martin Krischik wrote: > > You can put this in a script: > > > > cd gcc > > > > wget -qO- ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gmp/gmp-4.2.2.tar.bz2 | tar xjf - && > > mv gmp-4.2.2 gmp > > > > wget -qO- http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-current/mpfr-2.3.0.tar.bz2 | tar > > xjf - && mv mpfr-2.3.0 mpfr > > > > > > The rest is seemless. You don't even need to use the --with-gmp and > > --with-mpfr options. It's wonderful. > > Thanks for the hint - especially mentioning the need for "mv". I heard about > this option before but then this "minor" detail not mentioned. No problem. I don't have much to offer, but where I can help, I do :) FYI, the way that I understand it from previous emails I sent to the gcc list is that when done this way, gmp and mpfr will be compiled with an extremely compatible set of options, so it will definitely not be optimized for yoru specific platform. It'll work, though, which is the important part.