From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-30905-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5565 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2007 00:59:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 5555 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Dec 2007 00:59:51 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from hs-out-0708.google.com (HELO hs-out-2122.google.com) (64.233.178.250)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:59:42 +0000
Received: by hs-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 4so2441951hsl.8         for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:59:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.143.9.5 with SMTP id m5mr1555658wfi.94.1197939579469;         Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:59:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.199.17 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:59:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <b609cb3b0712171659x2339e0c8ya310986f0f2f9bbf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:59:00 -0000
From: NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com>
To: "Rick Mann" <rmann@latencyzero.com>
Subject: Re: More info: Binary built on different platforms with exact same tools different?
Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <D3994AA4-696E-4099-96BC-D2B7B533C7C1@latencyzero.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <5A2671EC-48B9-4492-A1E1-F346CE6811CC@latencyzero.com> 	 <D3994AA4-696E-4099-96BC-D2B7B533C7C1@latencyzero.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00324.txt.bz2

On 12/17/07, Rick Mann <rmann@latencyzero.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to ensure that all our developers build identical binaries.

Why would binaries on different platforms be identical?