From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.oetec.com (mail.oetec.com [108.160.241.186]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7A6F3857410 for ; Wed, 11 May 2022 17:52:08 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B7A6F3857410 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_SHORT, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-oetec-MailScanner-From: dclarke@blastwave.org X-oetec-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.836, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10, DKIM_VALID -0.10, DKIM_VALID_AU -0.10, DKIM_VALID_EF -0.10, NICE_REPLY_A -0.73, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED 0.00) X-oetec-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-oetec-MailScanner-ID: 24BHq3Gc005632 X-oetec-MailScanner-Information: Please contact oetec for more information Received: from [172.16.35.2] (cpeac202e7325b3-cmac202e7325b0.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.253.170.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.oetec.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8+deb9u1) with ESMTPSA id 24BHq3Gc005632 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 11 May 2022 13:52:05 -0400 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 13:52:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 Subject: Re: stage4 bootstrap exits with error 2 on 32-bit Debian arm-linux-gnueabi Content-Language: en-US To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: gcc-help References: From: Dennis Clarke In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-help mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 17:52:10 -0000 On 5/11/22 12:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 16:16, Dennis Clarke via Gcc-help > wrote: >> If anyone wonders why the bootstrap4 then the only answer I have is "why >> not?" given what I see at : https://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html > > Is "because it doesn't work" a good enough answer? Ha. Well I would not know that unless I tried. The results sure look pretty : io# io# ls -ltr --full-time */xgcc -rwxr-xr-x 1 dclarke devl 5743712 2022-05-10 17:20:58.783980821 +0000 stage1-gcc/xgcc -rwxr-xr-x 1 dclarke devl 2514244 2022-05-10 22:54:53.878374286 +0000 stage2-gcc/xgcc -rwxr-xr-x 1 dclarke devl 6378164 2022-05-11 02:04:07.126706718 +0000 prev-gcc/xgcc -rwxr-xr-x 1 dclarke devl 6378164 2022-05-11 05:21:43.023573431 +0000 gcc/xgcc io# io# io# openssl dgst -blake2s256 -r prev-gcc/xgcc gcc/xgcc 9cd9210dc9b0db574ea005e1cd83cc2013d071060fdb4f239aa09060e5b3db5f *prev-gcc/xgcc 9cd9210dc9b0db574ea005e1cd83cc2013d071060fdb4f239aa09060e5b3db5f *gcc/xgcc io# The result from stage3 perfectly matches stage4 and that is a good thing. > > Can you just try "make -j2" instead, without bootstrap4? Yep. No idea why a bootstrap fails but sure, I can just do the make and see what happens. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional