From: Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@courier-mta.com>
To: gcc-help <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: reload .so without restarting process
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cone.1385985344.398176.13181.1000@monster.email-scan.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHvbk5PQnhBQT=ubtbBqoMwnCuK5PnLDaFSmPf9f++4K5AKAOQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 844 bytes --]
Hatt Tom writes:
> If I use dlsym() to load the address manually ,will GOT be needed any
> more ?
If you always use dlopen(), and the dlsym() to call methods from a .so, you
don't really need to link to it directly, any more, so this is a moot point.
> 2013/12/2 Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>:
> > On Mon, 02 Dec 2013, Hatt Tom wrote:
> >
> >> And also : why cannot I dlclose a .so that I've linked my executable
> >> to, in the usual fashion.
> >>
> >> is it because the reference count of that .so would not alwayes to be
> zero ?
> >>
> >> It seems puzzling to me ?
> >>
> > how would you ensure consistency of the GOT ?
> > I think the problem is that you would end up with invalid addresses in the
> GOT
> > as they were setup by ld based on link-time information.
> >
> > thx!
> > hofrat
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards!
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-02 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-01 14:15 Hatt Tom
2013-12-01 14:28 ` Sam Varshavchik
2013-12-02 3:01 ` Hatt Tom
2013-12-02 3:36 ` Sam Varshavchik
2013-12-02 4:59 ` Hatt Tom
2013-12-02 11:52 ` Sam Varshavchik
2013-12-02 5:27 ` Hatt Tom
2013-12-02 6:24 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2013-12-02 6:49 ` Hatt Tom
2013-12-02 11:55 ` Sam Varshavchik [this message]
2013-12-03 1:23 ` Hatt Tom
2013-12-03 2:05 ` Sam Varshavchik
2013-12-03 2:28 ` Hatt Tom
2013-12-03 3:17 ` Sam Varshavchik
2013-12-05 2:02 ` Hatt Tom
2013-12-05 2:14 ` Jonathan Wakely
2013-12-05 5:24 ` Hatt Tom
2013-12-05 11:55 ` Sam Varshavchik
2013-12-05 14:02 ` net.study.sea
2013-12-13 1:13 ` Ángel González
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cone.1385985344.398176.13181.1000@monster.email-scan.com \
--to=mrsam@courier-mta.com \
--cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).