From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xry111@mengyan1223.wang>
Received: from mengyan1223.wang (mengyan1223.wang [89.208.246.23])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA9F13858C2C
 for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:27:32 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org AA9F13858C2C
Received: from [IPv6:240e:358:1120:b500:dc73:854d:832e:4] (unknown
 [IPv6:240e:358:1120:b500:dc73:854d:832e:4])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 (Authenticated sender: xry111@mengyan1223.wang)
 by mengyan1223.wang (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D60C66543;
 Fri, 22 Apr 2022 05:27:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <d5e8e0387157b9d22dbb7472baa8386f7bd8b461.camel@mengyan1223.wang>
Subject: Re: Compile time errors on using target attribute for Function
 Multi Versioning
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@mengyan1223.wang>
To: "Raut, S Biplab" <Biplab.Raut@amd.com>, "gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org"
 <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:27:26 +0800
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR12MB516654A4A860A107F20E9A73F5F79@DM4PR12MB5166.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DM4PR12MB5166A2758E1C4963C09422D6F5F79@DM4PR12MB5166.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
 <8cb9e6d0e8ece312768d0cb373cb05ca8e8e13d4.camel@mengyan1223.wang>
 <DM4PR12MB516654A4A860A107F20E9A73F5F79@DM4PR12MB5166.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.0 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3031.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS,
 SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-help mailing list <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-help>,
 <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-help>,
 <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:27:35 -0000

On Fri, 2022-04-22 at 08:17 +0000, Raut, S Biplab wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only]
>=20
> Thank you Xi Ruoyao for pointing that out.
> Any reasons why GCC does not support it for C?

The initial implemention reused the compiler component for C++ function
overloading.  And the C programmers likely prefer an explicit way using
`__attribute__((ifunc(...)))` so nobody really wanted to spend time
implementing this for C.

--=20
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@mengyan1223.wang>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University