From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24169 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2007 15:33:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 24152 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Nov 2007 15:33:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.231) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:33:12 +0000 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so2088016nzh for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:33:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.178.13 with SMTP id a13mr2524427wff.1196436789864; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:33:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.93.2 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:33:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:13:00 -0000 From: "Andrew Bell" To: "Tim Prince" Subject: Re: 4.2 build problem on redhat x86_64 Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <474F7E5E.2040204@computer.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00448.txt.bz2 On Nov 30, 2007 8:40 AM, Andrew Bell wrote> > On Nov 29, 2007 9:07 PM, Tim Prince wrote: > > Andrew Bell wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm trying to build 4.2.2 on a redhat x86_64 system. I get the > > > following during the configuration process that happens during make > > > bootstrap: > > > > > > .... > > > configuring stage 1 in ./bfd > > > loading cache ./config.cache > > > checking host system type... Invalid configuration > > > `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu': machine `x86_64-unknown' not recognized > > > > > > checking target system type... Invalid configuration > > > `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu': machine `x86_64-unknown' not recognized > > > > > > checking build system type... Invalid configuration > > > `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu': machine `x86_64-unknown' not recognized > > > .... > > Are you building gcc? Did you configure or build in one of the source > > directories, contrary to all advice? > > Yes, I am building gcc. I was trying to build gcc, but the process failed when trying to build the binutils that I linked in. Sorry. Is there are separate mailing list/set of maintainers for binutils? Thanks, -- Andrew Bell andrew.bell.ia@gmail.com