public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: MikeW <mw_phil@yahoo.co.uk>
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: gcc optimises out test of value in register-only loop
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20111013T124012-691@post.gmane.org> (raw)

sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.2.4 [unfortunately the version is tied to the
 kernel build. ]

In some kernel code where RAM is unavailable due to manipulation of the MMU,
I wanted to place some 'got here' stops in the code so I could ^C break in gdb,
reset a register value and allow execution to continue.

Accordingly I tried:
  volatile register int stop_loop __asm("r5")__;
...
  stop_loop = 0x1234;
  (disable MMU)
  while (stop_loop != 0);
...

which seemed to generate code that checks the value of r5 only once:

xxxx08: mov r5,r1
xxxx0a: tst r1,r1
xxxx0c: bf xxxx0c   ;r5 never tested again!!
xxxx0e: (unrelated code)

I also tried
  while ((volatile)stop_loop != 0);
and
  while ((volatile)(stop_loop != 0));

which both gave the original asm code as above.

So, in short, is there any way to persuade gcc to reload r5 - which could
in other non-debug situations be a global register variable updated
in an ISR, for example.

Or perhaps this is 'fixed' in a later gcc ...

             reply	other threads:[~2011-10-13 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-13 11:35 MikeW [this message]
2011-10-13 11:38 ` Andrew Haley
2011-10-13 11:56   ` MikeW
2011-10-13 11:58     ` Thomas Martitz
2011-10-13 12:01     ` Andrew Haley
2011-10-13 12:14       ` MikeW
2011-10-13 12:18         ` Andrew Haley
2011-10-13 12:05   ` MikeW
2011-10-14  4:41 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-10-14  9:07   ` Andrew Haley
2011-10-15  3:20     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-10-17  8:30       ` Andrew Haley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=loom.20111013T124012-691@post.gmane.org \
    --to=mw_phil@yahoo.co.uk \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).