From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18503 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2006 05:57:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 18494 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2006 05:57:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from yosemite.airs.com (HELO yosemite.airs.com) (205.217.158.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:57:21 +0000 Received: (qmail 16787 invoked by uid 10); 16 Mar 2006 05:57:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 21484 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2006 05:57:13 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org, kmshanah@disenchant.net To: Kevin Shanahan Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: gcc 4.1 -O1 problem References: <20060316044903.GE9176@cubit> From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:57:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20060316044903.GE9176@cubit> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00114.txt.bz2 Kevin Shanahan writes: > Are there any other options besides these which -O1 affects? -O1 is unfortunately not the sum of individual options. The compiler often simply checks whether you are optimizing at all, rather than checking specific options. Ian