From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12553 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2004 01:11:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12546 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2004 01:11:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO yosemite.airs.com) (209.128.65.135) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2004 01:11:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 15859 invoked by uid 10); 25 Apr 2004 01:11:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 18267 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2004 01:11:13 -0000 From: Ian Lance Taylor To: "Ganesh Tawde" Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: ARM GCC inline assembly] References: <22949.199.92.248.5.1082794983.squirrel@webmail.patni.com> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 01:11:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <22949.199.92.248.5.1082794983.squirrel@webmail.patni.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00326.txt.bz2 "Ganesh Tawde" writes: > I am trying to use the below pure assembly code as inline assembly in C. > The pure assembly code gives proper data but the inline assembly code > gives me distorted data. I am not able to figure out the problem. can any > body help me on this? Compile with --save-temps, and compare the .s file generated from the C code to the assembler code which is known to work. Perhaps that will suggest something. Ian