* Re: debugging switches/options with x86 target?
@ 2004-03-02 17:41 nirav.dalal
2004-03-02 17:44 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: nirav.dalal @ 2004-03-02 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eljay Love-Jensen; +Cc: gcc-help
Hi Eljay,
Yes, I have tried -g and -ggdb options and they do work, but I was
wondering
why the other options does NOT work.
- Nirav
Eljay
Love-Jensen To: nirav.dalal@teradyne.com, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
<eljay@adobe.com cc:
> Subject: Re: debugging switches/options with x86 target?
03/02/2004 12:31
PM
Hi Nirav,
Have you tried this...
g++ -mdll -DBUILD_DLL -O3 -c -fno-exceptions -g foo.cpp
...?
--Eljay
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: debugging switches/options with x86 target?
2004-03-02 17:41 debugging switches/options with x86 target? nirav.dalal
@ 2004-03-02 17:44 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Lance Taylor @ 2004-03-02 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nirav.dalal; +Cc: Eljay Love-Jensen, gcc-help
nirav.dalal@teradyne.com writes:
> Yes, I have tried -g and -ggdb options and they do work, but I was
> wondering
> why the other options does NOT work.
-gxcoff is only meaningful on AIX.
The problem with -gcoff sounds like a bug somewhere. I doubt anybody
cares very much, since COFF debugging information is very limited.
-gdwarf was removed recently, since DWARF 1 has been replaced by DWARF
2. -gdwarf-2 still exists.
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: debugging switches/options with x86 target?
@ 2004-03-02 17:31 Eljay Love-Jensen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eljay Love-Jensen @ 2004-03-02 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nirav.dalal, gcc-help
Hi Nirav,
Have you tried this...
g++ -mdll -DBUILD_DLL -O3 -c -fno-exceptions -g foo.cpp
...?
--Eljay
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* debugging switches/options with x86 target?
@ 2004-03-02 17:00 nirav.dalal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: nirav.dalal @ 2004-03-02 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
Hi,
I'm having issues with compiling gcc using debugging switches/options
with x86 target.
I have tried debug switches as under:
>gcc -mdll -DBUILD_DLL -O3 -c -fno-exceptions -gxcoff foo.cpp
cc1plus.exe: warning: `xcoff': unknown or unsupported -g option
cc1plus.exe: warning: `xcoff': unknown or unsupported -g option
cc1plus.exe: warning: `xcoff': unknown or unsupported -g option
>gcc -mdll -DBUILD_DLL -O3 -c -fno-exceptions -gcoff foo.cpp
C:\DOCUME~1\DalalN\LOCALS~1\Temp/cc6baaaa.s: Assembler messages:
C:\DOCUME~1\DalalN\LOCALS~1\Temp/cc6baaaa.s:2819: Fatal error: C_EFCN
symbol out of scope
>gcc -mdll -DBUILD_DLL -O3 -c -fno-exceptions -gdwarf foo.cpp
cc1plus.exe: warning: `dwarf': unknown or unsupported -g option
cc1plus.exe: warning: `dwarf': unknown or unsupported -g option
cc1plus.exe: warning: `dwarf': unknown or unsupported -g option
Why are these options unsupported? Am I missing something?
Any help on this problem is appreicated.
The GCC version I'm using is:
>gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.1 (mingw special 20030804-1)
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Thanks,
- Nirav
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-02 17:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-02 17:41 debugging switches/options with x86 target? nirav.dalal
2004-03-02 17:44 ` Ian Lance Taylor
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-02 17:31 Eljay Love-Jensen
2004-03-02 17:00 nirav.dalal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).