From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19123 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2002 21:38:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19116 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2002 21:37:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Aug 2002 21:37:59 -0000 Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu ([129.22.96.25] helo=multivac.cwru.edu) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17cYVD-0001bh-00 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2002 17:37:59 -0400 Received: (qmail 17751 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2002 21:38:16 -0000 To: gcc-help@gnu.org Subject: Re: a more universal BOOT_CFLAGS/BOOT_LDFLAGS References: In-Reply-To: (prj@po.cwru.edu's message of "Wed, 07 Aug 2002 17:35:47 -0400") From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? Mail-Copies-To: nobody Mail-Followup-To: gcc-help@gnu.org Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 14:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2 I wrote: > I've tried BOOT_CFLAGS/BOO_LDFLAGS and TCFLAGS, but it seems that > neither of these is used while compiling crtbegin.o. Just to clarify, there may be other cases where these variables are not used. I only know about crtbegin.o because I've set things up so compilation will fail if my flags are not used, so make stops at crtbegin.o. paul