* static stack check
@ 2008-03-27 10:44 Maurizio Papini
2008-03-27 17:26 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Maurizio Papini @ 2008-03-27 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
Dear all,
Is there any option to perform a static stack analysis for c++/c?
TIA
Maurizio
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: static stack check
2008-03-27 10:44 static stack check Maurizio Papini
@ 2008-03-27 17:26 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ian Lance Taylor @ 2008-03-27 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maurizio Papini; +Cc: gcc-help
"Maurizio Papini" <maurizio.papini@gmail.com> writes:
> Is there any option to perform a static stack analysis for c++/c?
Mainline gcc has a new option -Wframe-larger-than=LEN which warns
about large stack frames. It's not in 4.3.0, though.
If you mean something else, I think you will have to explain what you
mean by "static stack analysis."
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-27 17:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-27 10:44 static stack check Maurizio Papini
2008-03-27 17:26 ` Ian Lance Taylor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).