public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
To: noeljohn <noel.daniel@gmx.com>
Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Emission of store_multiple and load_multiple patterns
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:25:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mcr3a1pndbw.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27369674.post@talk.nabble.com> (noeljohn's message of "Fri\, 29 Jan 2010 01\:49\:27 -0800 \(PST\)")

noeljohn <noel.daniel@gmx.com> writes:

> Ian Lance Taylor-3 wrote:
>> 
>> noeljohn <noel.daniel@gmx.com> writes:
>> 
>>>   The array as I have seen is not being treated as a vector. What it does
>>> is
>>> it directly loads the integer array data into the stack. This is normally
>>> done for processors which does not have a support for multiple loading
>>> and
>>> storing of words. Is there any way by which we can convey gcc through
>>> macros
>>> that our architecture supports this multiple loading and storing
>>> facility?
>> 
>> I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean.  What specific
>> instruction are you trying to generate, and what precisely does it do?
>> When exact C code would you write that you would expect to generate
>> this instruction?
>> 
>> Ian
>> 
>> 
>
> Hello Sir,
>     The actual problem is that the array contents are not put in a separate
> data section we would see in .s file. Suppose we take a arm processor or
> rs6000 processor, a separate section will be created in which the array
> contents will be stored and then these array contents are loaded into the
> stack. I want this data section to be created. How should I go forward ?


Give us an example.  Show us some source code.

Ian

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-29 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-11  9:31 noeljohn
2009-12-12  2:21 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-12-14 12:40   ` noeljohn
2009-12-16  1:18     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2010-01-12  6:56       ` noeljohn
2010-01-28  6:16       ` noeljohn
2010-01-28  6:55         ` Ian Lance Taylor
2010-01-29  9:49           ` noeljohn
2010-01-29 15:25             ` Ian Lance Taylor [this message]
2010-02-01 10:12               ` noeljohn
2010-02-01 22:19                 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2010-02-02 13:05                   ` noeljohn
2010-02-23  8:03                   ` noeljohn
2010-02-23 18:30                     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2010-03-01 10:51                       ` noeljohn
2010-03-08 14:02                       ` noeljohn
2010-03-08 20:27                         ` Ian Lance Taylor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mcr3a1pndbw.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=iant@google.com \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=noel.daniel@gmx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).