From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22253 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2011 22:36:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 22125 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Feb 2011 22:36:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.67) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:36:15 +0000 Received: from wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.101]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p12MaCNE021113 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:36:12 -0800 Received: from pxi17 (pxi17.prod.google.com [10.243.27.17]) by wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p12MaAJT010527 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:36:11 -0800 Received: by pxi17 with SMTP id 17so106225pxi.11 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:36:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.144.2 with SMTP id r2mr9301928wfd.244.1296686170013; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:36:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from coign.google.com (dhcp-172-22-123-242.mtv.corp.google.com [172.22.123.242]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x35sm108013wfd.13.2011.02.02.14.36.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:36:09 -0800 (PST) From: Ian Lance Taylor To: kevin diggs Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: hail marry (booting PowerMac 8600) References: Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (kevin diggs's message of "Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:23:15 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 kevin diggs writes: > The differences are pretty extensive. But I will try to weed through > it and see if something jumps out. > > According to the .mesh.o.cmd file -fno-strict-overflow is also there. > > If it helps, I don't think 4.2.4 works either. I have not repeated the > exact test (a 4.2.4 compiled mesh with 4.3.5 everything else) but I > have tried to build the entire kernel with 4.2.4 and it behaved the > same as 4.3.5. Any chance the list of changes is smaller (between > 4.1.2 and 4.2.4)? Unfortunately not in any useful way. There are large numbers of changes in each gcc release, far too many to be able to usefully point at a specific change. Ian