From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10638 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2011 05:48:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 10629 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jun 2011 05:48:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.44.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 05:48:39 +0000 Received: from kpbe18.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe18.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.82]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p535mcsR022587 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:48:38 -0700 Received: from pwi9 (pwi9.prod.google.com [10.241.219.9]) by kpbe18.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p535mar6025421 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:48:36 -0700 Received: by pwi9 with SMTP id 9so846041pwi.10 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:48:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.58.15 with SMTP id l15mr283119wfk.418.1307080116179; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:48:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from coign.google.com (adsl-71-133-8-30.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [71.133.8.30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t15sm843824wfh.16.2011.06.02.22.48.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:48:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Ian Lance Taylor To: "Bill Cunningham" Cc: "Jonathan Wakely" , Subject: Re: gcc 4.6.0 breaks References: <000601cc217f$86606810$a9d3daad@YOUREDC1953E71> <000f01cc2188$1f0baef0$a9d3daad@YOUREDC1953E71> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 05:48:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <000f01cc2188$1f0baef0$a9d3daad@YOUREDC1953E71> (Bill Cunningham's message of "Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:49:40 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2 "Bill Cunningham" writes: > I had the script and sent it in and got back a message saying the > system wouldn't take large mail files. Now I might need cloog and ppl > too. You do not need cloog and ppl. They are optional. Do not be misled by the errors in the top-level config.log file. The configure script determines whether cloog and ppl are available by running tests. When those tests fail, gcc is built to not use cloog and ppl. > I think they are required and my C preprocessor fails sanity > checks. cpp is in the bin directory but there's nothing in the lib > directory. Shouldn't there be a cpp or libcpp.a there or > something. When I compile gcc's I get no pre-processor. gcc installs cpp in the bin directory. It does not install it in the lib directory; why should it? gcc does not have a libcpp.a file; why do you expect one? Ian