* any m68k gurus out there?
@ 2011-02-27 19:04 kevin diggs
2011-02-27 20:32 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: kevin diggs @ 2011-02-27 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
Hi,
While trying to REBUILD gcc 3.4.6 (using a -O0 version of itself) on a
68040 (Quadra 700, NetBSD 1.6.1) I am getting:
floatformat.s: Assembler messages:
floatformat.s:1047: Error: operands mismatch -- statement `fmovem.l
%fpcr,%d5' ignored
floatformat.s:1163: Error: operands mismatch -- statement `fmovem.l
%fpcr,%d5' ignored
during the build of libiberty. Ignore the .s. That is from some test
runs on floatformat.c
The base compiler is 2.95.3. When I tried to build binutils 2.16.1 using:
-O2 -m68040 -fomit-frame-pointer
I ended up with a lot of segfault and/or illegal instruction
utilities. Switching to:
-O0 -m68040
did seem to work. So I used the same to build the compiler. I then
tried to rebuild the compiler with its -O0 self. Except this time I
also tried to use the new binutils.
I checked the M68000PRM.pdf and this does seem to be a valid
instruction. Is the assembler messed up?
Thanks!
kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: any m68k gurus out there?
2011-02-27 19:04 any m68k gurus out there? kevin diggs
@ 2011-02-27 20:32 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ian Lance Taylor @ 2011-02-27 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kevin diggs; +Cc: gcc-help
kevin diggs <diggskevin38@gmail.com> writes:
> While trying to REBUILD gcc 3.4.6 (using a -O0 version of itself) on a
> 68040 (Quadra 700, NetBSD 1.6.1) I am getting:
>
> floatformat.s: Assembler messages:
> floatformat.s:1047: Error: operands mismatch -- statement `fmovem.l
> %fpcr,%d5' ignored
> floatformat.s:1163: Error: operands mismatch -- statement `fmovem.l
> %fpcr,%d5' ignored
>
> during the build of libiberty. Ignore the .s. That is from some test
> runs on floatformat.c
>
> The base compiler is 2.95.3. When I tried to build binutils 2.16.1 using:
>
> -O2 -m68040 -fomit-frame-pointer
>
> I ended up with a lot of segfault and/or illegal instruction
> utilities. Switching to:
>
> -O0 -m68040
>
> did seem to work. So I used the same to build the compiler. I then
> tried to rebuild the compiler with its -O0 self. Except this time I
> also tried to use the new binutils.
>
> I checked the M68000PRM.pdf and this does seem to be a valid
> instruction. Is the assembler messed up?
From your description, you have a problem with the assembler.
Presumably it does not support the 68040 %fpcr register. Or perhaps
your compiler is not correctly passing the -m68040 option to the
assembler.
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-27 19:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-27 19:04 any m68k gurus out there? kevin diggs
2011-02-27 20:32 ` Ian Lance Taylor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).