From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1882F3857341 for ; Fri, 6 May 2022 07:46:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1882F3857341 Received-SPF: SoftFail (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr is inclined to not designate 152.81.10.51 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=152.81.10.51; receiver=mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr"; x-sender="Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr"; x-conformance=spf_only; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 ip4:192.134.164.0/24 mx ~all" Received-SPF: None (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@tomate) identity=helo; client-ip=152.81.10.51; receiver=mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr"; x-sender="postmaster@tomate"; x-conformance=spf_only X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,203,1647298800"; d="scan'208";a="13351017" Received: from tomate.loria.fr (HELO tomate) ([152.81.10.51]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 May 2022 09:46:01 +0200 Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 09:46:00 +0200 Message-Id: From: Paul Zimmermann To: Alexander Monakov Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org, stephane.glondu@inria.fr, marc.glisse@inria.fr, sibid@uvic.ca In-Reply-To: <74dc894-7774-e5bb-81-c5955c94ee4@ispras.ru> (message from Alexander Monakov on Thu, 5 May 2022 17:56:26 +0300 (MSK)) Subject: Re: slowdown with -std=gnu18 with respect to -std=c99 References: <9f7e3aa9-8d46-1fbb-75b-1c8ad9a667f@ispras.ru> <4d36d96-2de9-f8ac-2d52-ea32b1cc6d9@grove.saclay.inria.fr> <74dc894-7774-e5bb-81-c5955c94ee4@ispras.ru> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-help mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 07:46:05 -0000 Dear Alexander, > Good point. Also could you please add latency metrics, I see that your testing > framework already exposes the '--latency' flag. here are latency metrics (still on i5-4590): | gcc-9 | gcc-10 | gcc-11 | ------------|-------|--------|--------| -std=c99 | 70.8 | 70.3 | 70.2 | -std=gnu18 | 59.5 | 59.5 | 59.5 | It thus seems the issue only appears for the reciprocal throughput. Best regards, Paul