public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* hppa64-hp-hpux11.00
@ 2001-08-30 18:02 Jack Cummings
  2001-09-04 19:25 ` hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 Alexandre Oliva
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jack Cummings @ 2001-08-30 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-help

So, I was crosscompiling gcc 3.0.1 for hppa64-hp-hpux11.00, and I get:

--

Testing libgcc1.  Ignore linker warning messages.
        /pkg/gcc/gcc__v3.0.1.dist/gcc-3.0.1/cross-obj/gcc/xgcc -B/pkg/gcc/gcc__v
3.0.1.dist/gcc-3.0.1/cross-obj/gcc/ -B/pkg/gcc/gcc__v3.0.1.dist/gcc-cross/hppa64
-hp-hpux11.00/bin/ -B/pkg/gcc/gcc__v3.0.1.dist/gcc-cross/hppa64-hp-hpux11.00/lib
/ -isystem /pkg/gcc/gcc__v3.0.1.dist/gcc-cross/hppa64-hp-hpux11.00/include -DCRO
SS_COMPILE -DIN_GCC    -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-pr
ototypes -isystem ./include  libgcc1-test.o -o libgcc1-test \
          -nostartfiles -nostdlib `/pkg/gcc/gcc__v3.0.1.dist/gcc-3.0.1/cross-obj
/gcc/xgcc -B/pkg/gcc/gcc__v3.0.1.dist/gcc-3.0.1/cross-obj/gcc/ -B/pkg/gcc/gcc__v
3.0.1.dist/gcc-cross/hppa64-hp-hpux11.00/bin/ -B/pkg/gcc/gcc__v3.0.1.dist/gcc-cr
oss/hppa64-hp-hpux11.00/lib/ -isystem /pkg/gcc/gcc__v3.0.1.dist/gcc-cross/hppa64
-hp-hpux11.00/include --print-libgcc-file-name`
/pkg/binutils/binutils__v2.11.2.dist/binutils-cross/bin/hppa64-hp-hpux11.00-ld:
warning: cannot find entry symbol main; defaulting to 4000000000001518
libgcc1-test.o: In function `main_without__main':
libgcc1-test.o(.text+0x10c): undefined reference to `$$divI'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

--

I take it binutils-2.11.2 doesn't cut it? Which version should I be using?

--Jack 

--
John ( Jack ) Cummings                     http://mudshark.org/jack 
Key fingerprint: 945A 89EB CA2D 6D93 7F15  5C97 1028 194E 5E7A 62DD

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: hppa64-hp-hpux11.00
  2001-08-30 18:02 hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 Jack Cummings
@ 2001-09-04 19:25 ` Alexandre Oliva
  2001-09-05  0:10   ` hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 Jack Cummings
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Oliva @ 2001-09-04 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jack Cummings; +Cc: gcc-help

On Aug 30, 2001, Jack Cummings <jack@needle.mudshark.org> wrote:

> I take it binutils-2.11.2 doesn't cut it? Which version should I be using?

Perhaps the CVS version of binutils?  That's what Markus Werle used to
get a 64-bit GCC on HP-UX 11.00, in a recent message sent to
gcc-help.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: hppa64-hp-hpux11.00
  2001-09-04 19:25 ` hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 Alexandre Oliva
@ 2001-09-05  0:10   ` Jack Cummings
  2001-09-05  0:44     ` hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 Alexandre Oliva
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jack Cummings @ 2001-09-05  0:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexandre Oliva; +Cc: gcc-help

On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 08:31:50PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
 
> > I take it binutils-2.11.2 doesn't cut it? Which version should I be using?
 
> Perhaps the CVS version of binutils?  That's what Markus Werle used to
> get a 64-bit GCC on HP-UX 11.00, in a recent message sent to
> gcc-help.

I got it to work with the HPUX ld. Is there any problems with me posting 
binaries, to save others the tedium of building a cross compiler?

--Jack 

--
John ( Jack ) Cummings                     http://mudshark.org/jack 
Key fingerprint: 945A 89EB CA2D 6D93 7F15  5C97 1028 194E 5E7A 62DD

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: hppa64-hp-hpux11.00
  2001-09-05  0:10   ` hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 Jack Cummings
@ 2001-09-05  0:44     ` Alexandre Oliva
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Oliva @ 2001-09-05  0:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jack Cummings; +Cc: gcc-help

On Sep  5, 2001, Jack Cummings <jack@needle.mudshark.org> wrote:

> Is there any problems with me posting binaries, to save others the
> tedium of building a cross compiler?

If you have made any changes to the sources, you must post them along
with the binaries.  Other than that, no, there isn't any problem.


Hmm...  I hope you don't mean posting the binaries in this mailing
list, though :-)

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-09-05  0:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-08-30 18:02 hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 Jack Cummings
2001-09-04 19:25 ` hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 Alexandre Oliva
2001-09-05  0:10   ` hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 Jack Cummings
2001-09-05  0:44     ` hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 Alexandre Oliva

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).