public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* No mention of 2.95.3's "atexit" problem on gcc home page
@ 2001-09-17 13:48 Chris Rankin
  2001-09-28 16:35 ` Alexandre Oliva
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Rankin @ 2001-09-17 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-help

Hi,

I was just about to upgrade my glibc-2.2.3 to
glibc-2.2.4 when I heard dark rumours that no 2.95.x
compiler could compile glibc-2.2. I found this quite
scary because *both* my boxes have glibc-2.2.3
compiled with gcc-2.95.3+nss-patch, which presumably
means that I have an "atexit-bug" waiting to happen...

I have scoured the Internet and uncovered two patches
for gcc:

2001-03-21  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	* crtstuff.c (init_dummy): Use CRT_END_INIT_DUMMY if
defined.
	Remove ia32 linux PIC kludge and move it...
	* config/i386/linux.h (CRT_END_INIT_DUMMY): ...here.

And then this later one for creating weak symbols:

	* rtl.h (SYMBOL_REF_WEAK): New macro.
	* rtlanal.h (rtx_addr_can_trap): Use it, a weak
SYMBOL_REF can trap.
	* varasm.c (make_decl_rtl): Mark SYMBOL_REF weak if
necessary.
	* rtl.texi (SYMBOL_REF_WEAK): Document it.
	* gcc.texi: Remove wrong description.

Now I'm hoping that these are the right patches and
the right *versions* of the patches. However, they
would both seem like excellent candidates to be posted
on

http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html

They're not there right now; maybe someone could add
them?

Cheers,
Chris


__________________________________________________
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: No mention of 2.95.3's "atexit" problem on gcc home page
  2001-09-17 13:48 No mention of 2.95.3's "atexit" problem on gcc home page Chris Rankin
@ 2001-09-28 16:35 ` Alexandre Oliva
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Oliva @ 2001-09-28 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Rankin; +Cc: gcc-help

On Sep 17, 2001, Chris Rankin <rankincj@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Now I'm hoping that these are the right patches and
> the right *versions* of the patches. However, they
> would both seem like excellent candidates to be posted
> on

> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html

Since I suppose they only affect glibc, it's the glibc documentation
that should cover them.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-09-28 16:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-09-17 13:48 No mention of 2.95.3's "atexit" problem on gcc home page Chris Rankin
2001-09-28 16:35 ` Alexandre Oliva

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).